That is what the Democrats, Media, FBI, CIA, HSA, IRS, and the Biden team would have us believe regarding the Biden family’s questionable activities.  I say it that way because there have been no serious convictions, so alleged is possibly the right word.  However, the preponderance of the evidence is growing larger and larger with each new revelation. 

Hunter Biden’s ex-business partner Devon Archer testified that Hunter put then Vice President Joe Biden on the phone with business associates at least two dozen times.  But wait, Joe knew nothing of Hunter’s business deals, right?   In light of his cognitive condition, that still might be true, but not from a legal standpoint.

One of those meetings was in Dubai on December 4, 2015.  You remember that Burisma, the Ukrainian energy company, paid Hunter $83,000 monthly to be on their board.  Nice work if you can get it, right?  Why would they pay a man who knew virtually nothing about the energy business that kind of money?  Could it be because his father was the sitting Vice President and could grant special favors? 

It seems that Vadym Pozharski, a senior Burisma executive, phoned Hunter and said that Burisma’s owner, Mykola Zlochevsky, needed to speak to Hunter urgently.  Then he asked, “Can you ring your dad?”  He indicated that Burisma bigwigs needed their support.  They asked for help to shut down the criminal investigation that named Zlochevsky by name.  That is when the amazing revelation that Joe told the Ukrainian government, “I’m leaving in six hours.  If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.”  The $1 billion in foreign aid.  No corruption there, right? 

Now we are apprised that the major Democrat donor, Elizabeth Hirsh Naftali, who bought Hunter’s art, was then named to a prestigious commission by Joe Biden.  Interestingly, the art industry is not subject to the Bank Secrecy Act’s (BSA) requirements, which mandate detailed procedures to prevent money laundering.  Imagine that Hunter entered a lucrative business with little scrutiny to identify possible financial wrongdoing.  No corruption, is possibly there, right?

We have been informed that the FBI tipped off the Biden team the night before Hunter faced his tax and gun probe interview.  We are told that on the day of the interview (nice, sanitized term), Federal agents were told to stand by and not approach Hunter Biden.  They had to wait for approval for higher up.  As a result, the IRS and FBI criminal investigators never got to interview Hunter Biden as a part of the investigation.  But there is no corruption to be found, right?

Most of us, if we were in Hunter’s place using drugs and possessing a Colt Cobra .38 Special, would have been indicted on federal firearms charges and sent to prison.  What did Hunter get?  What I would graciously call a slap on the wrist and told, “Bad Boy.”

Merrick Garland, the U.S. Attorney General, is extremely partisan and gave Hunter a sweetheart deal but has thrown the books at others who are conservatives or Trump supporters.  The judge rejected i. I believe it should have been incumbent upon the judge to hold up the deal until he had heard from Garland, Weiss, and the six witnesses that whistleblower Gary Shapley’s legal team had identified.  But, again, there is not even a smidgen of corruption, right?

Even with all the hoopla surrounding Hunter, he has continued to contact foreign agents, including those from China.  The damning revelations suggest that where there is smoke, there is a raging inferno of corruption, influence peddling, money laundering, and possibly treasonous activities by the Biden family.  Their bottom line seems to be their focus, not America or the American people.   We need answers, and we need them now!

The New York Times conceded that one of the bombshell claims made about the DOJ’s mishandling of the Biden probe, but they buried it deep inside their long article.  It was found in the 21^st paragraph. That is deep enough that most readers would have abandoned the lengthy article before discovering that revelation or admission.  But, again, there is no corruption or attempt to shield the Biden family.  Not even a smidgen, right?

I was amused by an article titled, “Biden torched for denying knowledge of Hunter’s ‘business deals:’ ‘Even lies about lying.’”  What would you expect? That is what those prone to lying do; they lie!  There are so many smoking guns that one can hardly see for the smoke filling the air. 

Almost every U.S. Attorney General has been loyal to the administration that appointed them.  However, we should have a reasonable expectation that they will not violate the law to protect against wrongdoing by their boss.  It appears that the FBI, the IRS, and the DOJ are all colluding and complicit in the overt protection and shielding of the Biden family. 

With the immensity of allegations swirling around the Biden family, how is a special prosecutor not named to look into this?  But to be honest, if one were appointed, it would be an exercise in futility, a waste of tax-payer dollars and drag out the matter.  This could be handled quickly, and justice should be done as required by the Constitution and the Law. 

Now, let me move beyond the corruption to the health of Joe Biden and say that while I empathize with him and his family over his cognitive and other possible physical conditions, he is sitting as the president. That means we cannot look beyond those issues and dismiss his other actions out of sympathy or empathy. 

I believe but have no way of confirming that Joe Biden has some severe medical conditions that make him unfit to be president.  How can anyone think the man has his cognitive reason when he ends a speech giving a diatribe about gun control and says for no apparent reason, “God save the queen, man.”  The queen was deceased.  What was he saying and why?

In that speech, he made some incredibly illogical statements, including, “Put a pistol on a brace, it turns into a gun — makes it more — you can have a higher-caliber weapon, higher-caliber bullet coming out of that gun.”  What are you talking about, sir?  What?  Of course, we dare not forget his ludicrous statement, “We have plans to build a railroad from the Pacific across the Indian Ocean.”   Just a few days earlier, he could not remember Winston Churchill’s name when speaking to the Prime Minister of Britain.

I shudder at the thought of Vice President Kamala Harris occupying the Oval Office, but something must be done.  Can we survive until November 2024 or January 2025?  I honestly do not know, but I know we desperately need some divine help, and we need to unite and back a candidate who has the cognitive reason to serve and will follow the Constitution and the Rule of Law. 

God bless you, and God bless America!