IF YOU CLAIM TO BE UNBIASED AND NON-PARTISAN – Be Unbiased and Non-Partisan…


My immediate focus is the pathological or serial liar, James Comey, the former director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.  His mask has fallen off if it was ever on in recent weeks.  His endless assertions of “I don’t know” or “I don’t remember” coupled with his press conference where he called for All Democrats to bury the hatchet and nominate someone to defeat Donald Trump and save America from this evil person. (His view, not mine).  His contradictory and outright lies are so many it is virtually impossible to count, but I’m sure some have.

It was James Comey who decided to conduct the Trump collusion investigation from the FBI headquarters.  Therefore, how could he not remember, know, or be able to give explicit details on what happened, when it happened, and why it happened?  Was he that incompetent? Were his associates that deceptive and able to hide from him their activities? Were his associates so adept at CYA they provided cover for their boss at every turn?  I assert that Mr. Comey remembers every detail with crystal clarity and has lied repeatedly to Congress, the President, and the American people.  When will he be indicted?  Let me answer that, likely never.

He and Robert Mueller have repeatedly entrapped people into not being fully forthcoming with the FBI and indicted them.  However, the repeated lies of Hillary Clinton and her associates have been overlooked, justified, or excused.  Why?  If the FBI can selectively pick and choose which false statements they are going to pursue as criminal excusing the Democrats but not the Republicans, that is a dangerous game. 

I continue to find it inexcusable that Mr. Comey and other leading Democrats can say one thing one time and another the next time and not be held accountable.  Take General Flynn’s case.  Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA), on May 11, 2018, sent a letter to FBI Directory Christopher Wray and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein stating that Mr. Comey testified that the FBI did not think that General Flynn lied.  That was from his testimony on before the House Intelligence Committee where he told those Congressmen that FBI agents had interviewed General Flynn and “saw nothing that indicated to them that the General knew he was lying to them.”   His unredacted testimony reveals that the FBI Agents did not detect any deception on the General’s part. 

General Flynn was doing his job during the transition period, but the FBI under James Comey opened an investigation on the General for doing his job.  Behind closed doors, Mr. Comey testified to Congress in his latest testimony that the General lied.  Mr. Comey, which testimony of yours is the truth?  Mr. Comey, can’t remember or doesn’t know so much but he knew enough to write a book then developed convenient and selective amnesia.  How convenient.

James Comey, the DOJ, and every other governmental agency involved knew that the FISA warrant was a fraud or based on unverifiable opposition research paid for by the Clinton camp.  He even confessed, previously, that the Steele dossier was unverifiable and unsubstantiated.  He knew that when they went to the FISA court but used a fake piece of intelligence, probably lying to the Judge to get the warrant to spy on the Trump team and even Trump himself.  He even told the President in his briefing that the dossier was “salacious and unverified.”  So much for non-partisan and unbiased, right?

How about the government contracts that Mr. Comey and Mr. Mueller leveraged for personal enrichment?  Mr. Comey left the Justice Department and was hired by Lockheed Martin for upwards of $6 Million for one year.  His security clearance could be a factor but couple that with his longtime friend Robert Mueller was running the FBI and then we saw $100 Million Dollar contracts being handed out to Lockheed Martin.  Coincidence?  You tell me.

When the Inspector General noted that the FBI had confirmed that there were lies told to the agents by Hillary Clinton and several of her associates, I thought, here come the indictments.  But alas, I was wrong, and I knew in my heart there would be not such indictments because that investigation was conducted while Hillary was running for and presumed to be the likely next president.  They were both protecting her and doing some CYA for themselves should she become the President. 

The double standard, the two-faced actions, the clearly partisan and biased actions of FBI agents so tainted the process that they devalued their worth greatly.  After his testimony before the House Committee, he held a press conference where he made some astounding statements.  Astounding, if he is what he has claimed to be, unbiased and non-partisan.  His own words defy that position and unmask him as a Liberal Leftists Democrat Activist posing as the standard bearer for values and morality.

He told MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace, “All of us should use every breath we have to make sure the lies stop on January 20, 2021,” Comey told an audience at the 92nd Street “Y” on New York City’s Upper East Side. He all but begged Democrats to set aside their ideological differences and nominate the person best suited to defeating Trump in an election. “I understand the Democrats have important debates now over who their candidate should be but they have to win. They have to win.”  Mr. Comey didn’t you mean we, not they because you are clearly in that number.  You suggested that if Trump were impeached one-third of the country would think their president had been ousted by a coup.  Don’t you mean one-half because that’s how many voted for him?

Mr. Comey and those of his ilk need to be held accountable for their trifling with the law and the truth.  If there is justice in America any longer, there must be an investigation, a real one, into the violations by Hillary, Obama, Holder, Lynch, Comey, and many others not just an attempt to bring down the sitting president by selectively going after his associates on whatever charge they can muster.  I am against corruption no matter where it is found.  I am also against, using the FBI, CIA, IRS, or any other governmental arm as a political weapon as is visible in today’s activities.             

It is time to restore integrity to our government if that is possible and ousts every person who follows an ideological belief that is detrimental to our Constitutional Republic.  That net needs to be thrown over Democrats and Republicans alike who are guilty.  We can move forward and see America restored if the Congressional Republicans will back the President as they promised to do in seeking election or reelection.

God bless you and God bless America!

Advertisements

THE DEATH OF A NATION…


There are numerous ways for nations to die and most of them involve self-inflicted wounds.  Obviously, a nation can die if it is conquered and the occupied and annexed then assimilated or incorporated into the conquering nation.  In that case, the conquered becomes a State within the victor nation and loses its sovereignty.  Conquering and occupying are not uncommon, and it has been called colonization, territories, or subjugation.  To the victor goes the spoils, so to speak.  Germany attempted that, so did the former Soviet Union, England did it in the Colonial period and has been recorded in the annals of history in virtually every era of recorded history. 

But, with regard to ‘self-inflicted wounds’ that kill a nation among those are allowing the ruling class to become an oligarchy if not a hard, tyrannical dictatorship.  In America, we have a Constitution that offers safeguards against that eventuality. but we have allowed the slow erosion of our Constitutional Form of Government.  We have witnessed the elected oligarchs advance their own interpretation of the Constitution.  At other times, they have ignored the Constitutional prohibitions and forced the individual States into subjection to the whims of the federal government.  That is both unwise and unconstitutional, but with the mentality of the courts for decades the legislators have been allowed to rewrite or reinterpret our American Constitution.  They have thereby neutered the States and stripped from us the ownership and oversight of our government.  Again, unwise and unconstitutional, but a present reality.

The Death of a Nation results when those in power find a way to manipulate the populace via entitlements and other economic measures.  A nation’s survival depends on its economic health and when the expenditures exceed the revenue, economic health is jeopardized.  No nation can sustain extended periods negative economic policies and survive.  Taxation is required to fund the spending but there is only so much revenue from taxation that can be extracted from those who pay taxes.  There is a breaking point in which either people stop producing, they revolt, or they run out of money.  The next move is increased debt and debt is the albatross hung around the necks of Free People that, if continued long-term, bankrupts them.

The Death of a Nation occurs when that nation ceases to defend its borders and allows the influx of hordes of newcomers who have neither interest or intent of preserving its sovereignty or advancement.  We are not talking about the preservation of the cultural heritage of the immigrants.  Everyone should hold dear their cultural heritage but when the demand for particular cultural heritage recognition weakens the Republic it cannot be mandated by law.  If there is no price for or value of citizenship, then the foundational principles of the nation become weakened to the point they are inconsequential.  

The Death of a Nation occurs when that nation loses its moral compass and opens the door to such gross self-centeredness and self-aggrandizement and selfishness that there is no sense of moral wrong or civic obligation.  There are biblical principles that must be adhered to if a society is to survive without anarchy and chaos.  If human life is devalued in any sector, it becomes devalued in every sector.  The Bible refers to that as “a little leaven, leavens the entire lump.”  If a nation becomes devoid of a sense of nationalism or patriotism that “what’s in it for me?” becomes the rule and guide that nation is in danger of suicide.

There are visible symptoms of the Death of a Nation that the honest observer cannot miss.  Social Decay is one of the most glaring signs because from the ashes of that condition rises the political opportunists who desire power and control.  It may sound reasonable to demand that the youth be given an equal voice in society, but I argue that devoid of traditional guidelines those youth tend to grow wild and undisciplined and contribute to or open the door for societal destruction. 

In the French Revolution, Jose Ortega y Gasset noted that “Order is not pressure which is imposed upon society from without, but an equilibrium which is set up from within.”  Founding Father, John Adams, argued that “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people.  It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”  He was joined by numerous other Founders including, Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, Robert Winthrop, Noah Webster, James Wilson, John Jay, Fisher Ames, Gouverneur Morris, and Benjamin Rush to name a few. 

Our first president and the man known as the Father of the Nation, George Washington said in his first inaugural address declared, “…we ought to be no less persuaded that the propitious smiles of heaven, can never be expected on a nation that disregards the eternal rules of order and right, which heaven itself has ordained.”  He also said in a letter to James Madison, November 30, 1785, “We are either a United people, or we are not. If the former, let us, in all matters of general concern act as a nation, which have national objects to promote, and a national character to support. If we are not, let us no longer act a farce by pretending to it.”  A Nation cannot survive if it loses focus on its purpose and becomes a nation of individuals who are laws unto themselves.

In today’s America, we are witnessing the pitting of various cultures, ethnicities, classes, and ideologies against each other.  There are those, seeking power and control, attempting to manipulate the national conversation and cause fear and hate to boil over resulting in chaos and anarchy.  Those sinister would-be conquerors appear willing to do anything to secure their ascension to and solidification of a position of power.  A Free Republic dies when it loses sight of the vision, reason, and purpose for which it was established.  John F. Kennedy said it well when he said, “Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.”  No, I am not suggesting that we make the Nation our god but that we recognize that “united we stand, and divided we fall.”

I see the signs and symptoms of a Nation diseased and racing toward death.  Yet, I also see signs of and hope for a cure that can restore this Republic to her original foundational purpose and principles.  There is a remedy and part of that remedy is found in 2 Chronicles 7:14. If we, as individuals and a people will humble ourselves, seek the face of God, turn from wickedness ceasing to call evil good and good evil and repent.  God has promised to heal our land.  Additionally, it is imperative that each of us, American citizens, invest ourselves in following honest, right, and moral principles in our daily dealings with others.  “Do unto others as we would have them do unto us.”  We must educate ourselves, become involved and strive to achieve the return of our Constitutional Government rather than allowing a continued Legislative or Judicial Oligarchy. 

We will watch our Nation Die or will we seek to find a cure and become part of the solution rather than contributing to the problem?  That is something that everyone must answer for themselves and in that answer comes the final outcome.

God bless you and God bless America!

ARE WE AT THE EDGE OF THE PRECIPICE or HANGING OVER THE EDGE BY OUR FINGERNAILS?


BLOG POST 4 - Edge of the Precipice

I never cease to be amazed but not amused at the Democrats, the MSM, and the Never Trump cults insistence that Donald Trump could not have beaten Hillary Clinton without Russian interference.  Even, Rod Rosenstein and other leading Democrats in various agencies acknowledged that was a farce, but it is still the assertion of the leftists and Trump haters.  Hillary lost because Hillary was a terrible candidate and her policies were not what most Americans wanted, at least not those who work for a living and think.  Enough people were aroused and awakened who wanted to go a different direction to turn the tide.  The Obama followers in the DOJ acknowledged that not one vote was changed because of alleged Russian intervention.  The election was legitimate, just not what they wanted so they scream fraud.

When the shoe is on the other foot and there is clear evidence of voter fraud and collusion by the Left, they charge those protesting of being racist, haters, or conspiracy kooks who deserve no consideration.  It is interesting how the Left shifts when things go their way or when they do not.  If they fail, it is somebody else’s fault and if they succeed, regardless of tactics or corruption there can be no questioning of their win.  Remember how Hillary tried to paint Trump as a deranged devil when he refused to say that he would accept the outcome.  She insisted that to do less was Un-American, then she did less and has refused to accept the outcome two years later.

Donald Trump has insisted, as have many of us, that James Comey, Hillary Clinton, the Obama administration, and others should be investigated.  There were cursory sham investigations of Hillary’s scandals and even the then director of the FBI James Comey acknowledged Hillary and others lied to the FBI and she had committed gross negligence.  However, the Democrats in control took the necessary steps to guarantee no indictments, broke out the brooms and swept everything under the rug.  But when it comes to Donald Trump they use a fake dossier that was opposition research filled with fraudulent and unverifiable information and called it intelligence.  From that platform, they launched a never-ending fishing expedition (Investigation) that was supposed to be about Russian Collusion but has been about anything but that topic.

Those involved know that there is nothing there and rather than end the investigation they go after anyone and everyone for anything trying to get someone to incriminate the president on something.  Rudy Giuliani granted an interview to Axios (A Millennial journalist enterprise).  Out of that interview, we now know what the Mueller Team wants answers to from the president.  It goes back to the campaign and Trump being Trump and cracked a joke or used sarcasm toward the CIA and FBI regarding Hillary Clinton’s emails.  Do you remember?

Trump said, “Hey, Russia!  If you’re listening, maybe you can find the emails that the media can’t find of Hillary’s – – and if you do find ‘em, and hand ‘em over.”  To argue that Trump was asking the Russians to interfere in the election is beyond ludicrous.  Hey, did anyone find it disturbing that Barack Obama would tell Putin’s emissary, Medvedev, to relay to Vladimir that after the election Obama would have more flexibility?  Not a whimper of protest from the Democrats, the MSM, or even most Republicans.  Where was the outrage when Hillary orchestrated the transfer of Uranium holdings to Russian?  We have been told that Hillary was joking when she called the Trump supporters “a basket of deplorables.”  I guess the Left can crack jokes but not those on the Right.

If Mueller and his team actually think that Trump was asking the Russians to hack Hillary’s computers, they are more naïve or lacking the ability to use any measure of reason than I thought.  They know better but when the fish aren’t biting you must move to different locations and try different bait trying to elicit a response from the swimmers.

Throughout this entire process and before there was the repeated ‘looking the other way’ regarding real crimes and violations of federal standards by Hillary, Comey, Holder, Lynch, and a myriad of others.  From what I have seen, if there was any real collusion with the Russians it was from the Democrats.  When you, cherry pick what laws you are going to enforce, as was the case with Barack Obama, you create a situation where the entire justice system is damaged.  In this past mid-term elections, the enormity of voter fraud, virtually all committed on behalf of the Democrats should not be overlooked.

I can only imagine what our Founding Fathers would have thought about federal law enforcement agencies and arms of government planting spies in a political candidate’s campaign.  The FBI even attempted to bait people in the campaign to break the law.  If anything had been done outside the bounds of legitimacy it would have been front page news.  Polls such as YouGov and The Economist report that 42% of Americans think the Russians tampered with the 2016 ballots would be laughable were it not so serious.  Of course, as with most polls, these were likely heavily slanted and seeded with liberal leftists and not a random sample of Americans.

I am 100% convinced that if Donald Trump had colluded with the Russians and the Russians actually managed to tamper with ballots and alter the election, President Trump would be behind bars.  The investigation was supposed to have been about Russian Collusion, but it has morphed into an investigation into everything in President Trump’s life and anyone associated with him.  It appears to be more about damaging him or destroying him in any fashion than determining if there was foreign tampering with our elections.  I wonder why there is not the same devotion to investigating the votes by illegals in our elections.  Why is there not a sustained investigation into the voter intimidation by various groups while former President Obama was in office?  Why was Eric Holder given a pass when he back in 2011 he said, that the case against the New Black Panthers demeans his people. He refused to prosecute because they were black.  That is a story of far more significance than the faux Russian Collusion story.

America, I fear that we are not just standing at the edge of the precipice of the destruction of our Republican System of Government but may have fallen over the side and holding on by our fingernails.  Joseph Goebbels said, “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.  The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield people from political, economic, and/or military consequences of the lie.  It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”  That philosophy is being played out before our very eyes in the MSM, activist, and Leftist Democrats following the toxicity of their liberal ideology and agenda.

God help us, and God bless America!

 

MATURITY AND IMMATURITY – What Politics Needs But Doesn’t Have…


BLOG POST 3 - Maturity

Maturity is not always age related.  How many remember the argument from the David Hogg’s of this world, the Democrats, and many in the Media arguing that kids younger than eighteen should be allowed to vote?  Many of them have argued that sixteen-year-old children should be given a voice in our elections and some even contended that those as young as fourteen should be granted that privilege.  Were they serious?  Do wild bears live in the woods?  Yes, Alice, even though this is not Wonderland they live in that Fantasy Land on this matter.

But alas, their continued illogic surfaces again and again.  Remember in that argument, they wanted a law that prohibited anyone younger than twenty-one from purchasing a firearm, especially a so-called assault rifle.  The selective arguments as to what children should be allowed to do have always been perplexing, sometimes humorous, but usually frustrating.  It seems they see no illogic in their illogical and contradictory positions.  But, then we are talking about those ascribing to the view of toxic liberalism.

In September, while attacking Brett Kavanaugh’s alleged actions as a teenager, seventeen to be more specific, something amazing happened.  None other than Spartacus himself, Senator Cory Booker advanced legislation that would let seventeen-year old’s off the legal hook.  In his legislation called the REDEEM Act sponsored with Senator Rand Paul, he insisted the seventeen-year-old were not mature enough to be held accountable for their actions.  What?  Senator Booker, you believe that those who are seventeen are not mature enough or have the brain development necessary to be held accountable for their actions.  However, you believe that seventeen-year-old Brett Kavanaugh should be hung from the guard arm for his alleged actions.  Isn’t that a wee-bit hypocritical and inconsistent?

Keith Ellison’s accuser has complained that the Democrats ‘smeared, threatened, and isolated her.’  She provided medical records that revealed on two separate visits to the doctor she had been abused.  She stated that “Four people, including my supervisor at the time, stated that I came to them after and shared the exact story I shared publicly.  I shared multiple texts between me and Keith, where I discuss abuse with him and much more.  As I said before, I knew that I would not be believed.”  What happened to every woman who makes a complaint must be heard and believed?  I guess that does not apply to Democrats, right?

Senator Booker might have a point regarding some of the actions of the brain of a seventeen-year-old.  I am not a medical doctor, a psychiatrist, or a scientist, and do not play one on television, so I cannot clinically address the possibilities of that assertion or argument.  However, if we are going to argue that the seventeen-year-old brain is insufficiently developed to allow them the maturity to be held accountable with a blanket law I see a problem.  No, I see numerous problems and the selective application of that law or view is problematic.

I can see a virtual Pandora’s Box being opened because every seventeen-year-old and every fifty-year-old are different.  Every human being is different.  We need some blanket laws or society crumbles.  However, in this argument, if the seventeen-year-old is argued to be insufficiently mature to be held accountable for their actions, how in the name of everything sensible can they be allowed to vote?

I do not want to see any teenager’s life ruined by one mistake whenever it is possible to avoid that destruction.  I believe in second chances and am thankful that God has given me a second, third, fourth, etc. chance.  In Senator Bookers REDEEM Act the law would mandate that the criminal records of those youths would be sealed.  If that is what he truly believes should have happened, then Dr. Ford’s and a myriad of other allegations from teen years would be allowed to surface.  The destruction done in the Kavanaugh case is permanent as it has been with Justice Clarence Thomas and scores of others too numerous to mention. Another potential problem of not having the pathway to trying a seventeen-year-old as an adult is the possibility of some incredibly troubled teenagers or manipulators of those teens taking advantage of that ‘get out of jail free card.’ 

How about former President Bill Clinton’s accuser, Juanita Broaddrick?  She accused him of actual rape, forced sexual assault.  He was the Attorney General of Arkansas and the Democratic nominee for Governor.  His star was shining bright and he was rising to acclaim so protect him they did.  This was not a singular occurrence for we had the testimony of Paula Jones during his term as Governor and Kathleen Willey during his time in the White House.  Not to mention Monika Lewinsky.  Senators Feinstein, Schumer, Durbin, and Patty Murray voted against impeachment in the face of glaring evidence and perjury by the President.

If Senator Booker and the Democrats or Republicans believe the assertions he makes in defense of his legislation are true how do they reconcile their inconsistencies?  How can you advocate for allowing people younger than eighteen to vote when those younger are deemed too immature to own a firearm or be held accountable for their actions?  I am waiting for their response and suspect it will be a doozy laced with inconsistencies and standard Leftist rhetoric that is nonsensical.

Could we attempt to reclaim some sensibility in America and hold politicians on both sides of the aisle accountable for their ridiculous political antics and nonsensical legislation and actions?  Could we, you and me, the average American citizen determine that we will become involved in the political process and refuse to be manipulated by politicians with nefarious and opprobrious intentions?  Could we, somehow, take a stand in defense of the Constitution, the Rule of Law, and strive to reclaim some moral sanity in this Republic.

God bless you and God bless America is my prayer and desire!

THE ENEMY OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH…


BLOG POST 2 - Enemy

The Democrats, some Republicans, and the Main Stream Media all insist that Donald John Trump, the President of these United States is the greatest threat to Freedom of Speech in our lifetime.  I have one small pertinent question, “Where were the complaints when Barack Hussein, the former President, evicted a reporter for asking a question?”  You don’t remember that?  Convenient and selective memory?

CNN Reporter, Jim Acosta is a media thug that believes it is his moral mandate or whatever kind of mandate he believes in, to attack President Trump on everything and whenever and wherever the opportunity presents itself.  President Obama challenged a reporter that interrupted him and asked a question that he obviously did not like.  He said, “You are in My House.”  The reporters in the room chanted “Throw Him Out!”  The MSM applauded the president but when Donald Trump takes similar action against one of the liberal leftist activist of CNN he is worse than Lucifer himself.

It is not that I agree or disagree with Trump or Obama on their handling of the reporters but the double standard being used, that is my issue.  I have no problem with Obama or Trump dealing with rude and interruptive reporters but if it was okay for Obama then it should also be okay for Trump.  I am 100% in favor of Freedom of Speech and believe that is speech is not free for everyone it is free for no one.  I may not like what you have to say but you have the right to speak your mind.  The caveat that I place on that is somewhat two-fold.  You do not have the right to endanger me and you do not have the right to violate my house.  If I lay down guidelines of decorum and you are invited to my house, you can be and should be expected to abide by them.

Once you leave my house you are free to write or say whatever you please, within limits of the law.  But, while you are in my house I have every right to ask you to cease your disruption and rudeness or the right to show you the door.  You may disagree and argue that the White House is our house and we can say or do whatever we want there.  It is the people’s house in the sense that we are the true owners and overseers of government.  However, when we elect a President and he takes up residence and conducts business there, it is his house.  I say that in the same sense that I would say that if you rented a house it is your house while you live there and maintain the provisions of the rental agreement.

Obama removed a heckler in 2015 for disagreeing with his deportations of illegals.  Obama said, “Shame on you.  Listen you are in my house and it is not respectful.”  I don’t disagree.  The heckler continued to interrupt, and Obama asked for the heckler to be removed from the room.  The former president said, “As a general rule I am just fine with a few hecklers. But not when I’m up here in the house.”  Okay with hecklers?  I would say that you were not okay and now that President Trump has reacted in a very direct manner to a reporter who was, in a very real sense, interrupting and heckling him, you and the Left consider it the epitome of evil and a threat to our Freedom of Speech.  Double Standards are double standards and should not be allowed.

Obama said that if the guests were “eating the hors-d’oeuvres and drinking the booze” they were expected to listen respectfully.  Hey, I do not disagree, but I am concerned that the blind hatred for President Trump allows the double standard to become the norm.  I am convinced that if President Trump said we were going to open the borders and allow anyone and everyone to come into this country unvetted the Left would argue that there was something nefarious in his edict.  I would too, but that is not my point.  The point is that no matter what he does, he is damned.  He can do exactly what President Obama did and he is wrong.  He can do the exact opposite of President Obama and he is wrong.  At least in the eyes and rhetoric of the Democrats, MSM, and the haters in this country.

Freedom of Speech has an enemy and that is Political Correctness that has become so pervasive in this country it is stifling freedom.  Well, freedom is stifled for anyone who disagrees with the ideological position and agenda of those following the toxicity of liberalism embraced by the Democratic Party.  I am a devoted advocate for the preservation of our inalienable rights including the 1st Amendment and Freedom of Speech.  When institutions of higher learning (tongue in cheek) ban anyone holding an opposing view to the Socialist Liberal Leftist Progressive view of today they become the enemy of Freedom of Speech.

Freedom of Speech must walk hand in hand with the right to Peaceable Assembly.  You can preach your beliefs with the fervor of an evangelist and I will defend your right.  However, if you, as some have, call for the eradication of ethnicities I will argue that you are in violation of our constitution, the law, and abusing your right to Freedom of Speech.  I am okay with classrooms teaching the theory of evolution, although I do not believe in it, so long as they give equal time to creationism.  If a news outlet claims to be a body that reports the news they should ‘report the news’ not ‘make the news or become the news.’ 

The enemies of Freedom of Speech are those who seek to silence any segment of our society for their political purposes.  If you disagree with me, you are not obligated to engage in conversation with me or debate me. Institutions of higher learning should be about unveiling truth not propagating a particular view.  Critical thinking’s departure is a very real danger in our American society today.  The fact that people, many people, no longer think but regurgitate what they hear from their source of ‘news’ leaves this Republic open to internal destruction and exposes us to outside enemies.

I stand for your right and my right of Free Speech.  When any group becomes the self-appointed police of what is acceptable speech without due process they are the enemy of Freedom of Speech.  Someone asked if I watch CNN or MSNBC and my answer is no.  Oh, I will occasionally listen to hear what they are saying, then fact check their assertions, allegations, or charges so I can present truth to anyone who will listen.  If 95+% of everything that comes from a source is Anti-conservatism and an attack on President Trump and the agenda voted for by the American people, I turn it off.  They can say it, but I don’t have to listen to it.

If you want to protect and preserve our inalienable right of Freedom of Speech you need to think and develop the ability to use critical analysis and thinking.  You need to examine what is being done and the inherent dangers of censorship.  If you do that I am convinced you will reject the liberal leftists socialist of the Democratic Party and vote for candidates that stand for the rule of law and the constitution.  It is, in a very real sense, a fight for Faith, Family, and Freedom.

God bless you and God bless America!

NOWHERE TO HIDE…


BLOG POST 1 - Nowhere to Hide

Several things have stood out to me recently that have reaffirmed my belief that the Leftists Liberal Progressives Democrat or RINOs are far more interested in harming Donald Trump than they are America.  It is about power and that will not change in the foreseeable future unless something dramatic happens in the hearts of politicians and the public.

There is a short video clip that gives the reason that Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats want open borders.  The clip can be viewed at pic.twitter.com/7KCM9K3leB.  It is quite revealing as to the ulterior motive behind the push for broad-brush amnesty and open borders.  The sad reality is that this will move the needle on precious few who are not already adamantly opposed to open borders and want to retain and maintain our national sovereignty and security.  The sheep that follow MSNBC, CNN, and the other media propaganda outlets of the Democrats will continue to shout, Amen and vote Blue.  Facts are anathema to them and when facts are presented they usually resort to name calling and shouting “Trump Bad! Trump Bad!” in the spirit of Jim Acosta and Maxine Waters.

You may recall the memo from Clinton’s former communications director Jennifer Palmieri regarding the Dreamers.  She said, “The fight to protect Dreamers is not only a moral imperative, but it is also a critical component of the Democratic Party’s future electoral success.”  Ms. Palmieri, me thinks that the last part of your statement reveals how little you truly believe in the first part. It reveals the motive behind the push of the Left to obliterate our American borders and national sovereignty.  Does that trouble you?  It does me, but there is not one sound of protest from the media and not much from the Republicans in Washington.

Queen Nancy Pelosi’s unintentional or intentional exposure of their motives is clear but another factor she failed to mention is the huge vineyards owned by her and her husband in California and their need for cheap labor.  She demands that we have a minimum wage of $10-14 per hour but does not pay her illegals the minimum.  But, that’s okay since she is a Liberal Leftists Progressive Democrat, right?  Only in the minds of the New Democratic Party of Socialist in America.

Another thing that reveals how far into the tank or toilet we find ourselves is in the response of Chief Justice John Roberts to President Trump’s complaint that an Obama Judge ruled against his Asylum edict.  Justice Roberts insisted that we do not have Obama Judges, Clinton Judges, Bush Judges, and Trump Judges.  Justice Roberts your words reveal that you are anything but a conservative and a constitutional originalist.  You are another of the Swamp Denizens who continually seek to protect their own and secure your place in the Swamp hierarchy and guard your historical legacy.  America be damned if protecting America interferes or conflicts with your agenda.

How about United States District Court Judge Carlton Reeves an Obama appointee in striking down Mississippi’s law against abortions after fifteen weeks.  He not only struck it down, but he also expressed his reasons in incredibly radical and partisan language.  He said that the law “unequivocally” violated women’s constitutional rights.  He found zero “legitimate state interest strong enough, prior to viability, to justify a ban on abortions.”  He added that “the Mississippi Legislature’s professed interest in ‘women’s health’ is pure gaslighting.”  He then made a statement that made my skin crawl and the hair stand up on the back of my neck.  He said that Mississippi’s law to protect the unborn reflected “the old Mississippi.”  He argued that it was the Mississippi that was bent on controlling women and minorities.  Sounds like judicial activism to me.

Everybody and their puppy dog knows that we have judges that are partisan and hold a political bias.  What we are supposed to have is what Roberts said we have, “Impartial Justices and Impartial Justice.”  One of the major reasons the Founding Fathers gave federal judges lifetime tenures was designed to ensure that we maintained judicial impartiality.  They believed that by removing the fear of removal from office of the need to seek reelection would remove the tendency to be biased and help them maintain impartiality.  Some seem to achieve that but too many are simply, Obama judges, Clinton judges, Bush judges, or Trump judges.  It is in the best interest of America for our judicial system to be blind to party, politics, or anything other than the Constitution.

The danger laced in judicial activism is that a paltry one percent of federal appellate decisions gets reviewed.  That has resulted in courts like the Sixth Circuit becoming a ‘de facto’ Mini Supreme Court.  That is true with each of the twelve circuits and is a problem.  I have argued for a long time that judicial appointments are probably the most important thing that a president does.  If the President appoints judges that are not activist but are constitutional originalist we have a hope of restoring and preserving our System of Government.  If the courts are packed with liberal activist such as was the case under former President Obama, we have rulings like that of Judge Carlton Reeves.

It is imperative President Trump strive to make the lower and mid-level federal courts as constitutional as possible.  He dare, not focus solely on the Supreme Court and fail to nominate and appoint constitutionalist to the lower courts.  The impact that President Trump has on the courts over the next two years will largely determine the success or failure of Constitutional America.  We need fidelity to the Constitution, not judges who follow Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals.  Those are further reasons to stay engaged and work diligently to defeat every liberal leftist’s progressive socialist in 2020.  America’s future depends on it and on us to pray, labor, and vote.

God bless you and God bless America!

THE GOVERNMENT and THE POOR…


BLOG POST 3 - Government and the poor

I can and will give you numerous biblical and constitutional references including the statements of our Founding Fathers and the Framers of our American Constitution on this matter.  It is, in my view, essential and germane to the discussion and a requirement for refuting the fallacy that caring for the poor is the government’s job.  We have reached a place in America where entitlements are considered rights and the responsibility of the federal government.  That, in my view, is one of the mistakes we have made and has done incredible damage to our nation and our society.  I will attempt to explain.

In Deuteronomy Chapter 15 we have an indication of God’s purpose for caring for the poor.  It was exclusively the responsibility of individuals, not governments to minister to and care for those who were poor or impoverished at any given time.  I believe that Jesus and the New Testament reveal that it is expanded to the Church as is seen in the Gospels and the Book of Acts.  In Deuteronomy 24:19-21, “When you reap your harvest in your field and have forgotten a sheaf in the field, you shall not go back to get it; it shall be for the alien, for the orphan, and for the widow, in order that the LORD your God may bless you in all the work of your hands. 20 ” When you beat your olive tree, you shall not go over the boughs again; it shall be for the alien, for the orphan, and for the widow. 21 “When you gather the grapes of your vineyard, you shall not go over it again; it shall be for the alien, for the orphan, and for the widow.”  That directive was first listed in Leviticus 19:9-10 and Leviticus 23:22. It is a biblical principle to Care for the Poor.

In the Bible, God’s instructions for caring for the poor, any farmer or keeper of the vineyards were to leave something for the poor.  Leviticus 23:11 speaks of the seventh year’s rest of the land so that the needy and even the beast of the field could eat of what grew on its own.  I insert an interesting fact that today’s welfare and entitlement process and mentality overlook, and objects to.  The poor had to do the work for themselves!  They had to gather the produce that was left for them.  The farmer did not harvest it and bring it to them, they labored for it.

That is consistent with the directive of the apostle Paul in 2 Thessalonians 3:10, “…if anyone is not willing to work, then he is not to eat, either.”  Simply, if a person is too lazy to gather for himself or work for his sustenance, he is to be afforded no consideration.  I did not say, ‘could not work’ but ‘would not work’ or ‘was not willing to work.’  There is a significant difference and the Bible addresses that as well.  If you were truly physically incapable of working charity was provided for them.

The biblical policy of caring for the poor was initially accepted and adopted in America.  The colonist and Americans after the Revolutionary War followed that mentality.  The result was not the absence of any poor, but more who were poor felt the pinch of hunger and altered their attitude.  Work was expected, and work was done!  Today, there are too many who, for whatever reason, believe that we are to simply offer handouts to whoever claims to be poor.  One clear objective is buying votes, and another seems to be putting a salve on the conscience for the personal neglect of caring for the poor.  If we make it the government’s job, we are absolved of responsibility and relieved of guilt for our failure.

Benjamin Franklin’s response to an English practice of providing for the poor by taxing citizens.  In part, he wrote, “I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means.  I think the best way of doing good to the poor is not making them easy in poverty but leading or driving them out of it.  In my youth I traveled much, and I observed in different countries that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves and of course became poorer.  And on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves and became richer… I affirm that there is no country in the world in which the poor are more idle, dissolute, drunken, and insolent.  The day you passed that act, you took away from before their eyes the greatest of all inducements to industry, frugality, and sobriety… In short, you offered a premium for the encouragement of idleness, and you should not now wonder that it has had its effect in the increase of poverty.  “Six days shalt thou labor.” (Exodus 20:9), though one of the old commandments long treated as out of date, will again be looked on as a respectable precept; industry will increase (and with it plenty among the lower people); their circumstances will mend, and more will be done for their happiness by inuring [enabling] them to provide for themselves than could be done by dividing all your estates among them.”  That is powerful!

Mr. Franklin listed several bad fruits that resulted when the biblical pattern was ignored.  He could not foresee our current situation, but he was speaking directly to it.  He cited the increase in poverty, ungratefulness, laziness, higher taxes with no resulting benefits.  Those alone should move us immediately away from our current policy regarding entitlements and welfare, but it doesn’t.

Our Founding Fathers were very concerned, as am I, about caring for the poor and needy among us.  Thomas Jefferson and George Washington were both incredibly generous as was demonstrated through their personal charity.  Both were leaders in organizing the community to care for the poor, but both argued adamantly that whatever the poor received could not and must not encourage laziness or idleness.  They also argued, that it was not the responsibility of the government but the individual to care for the poor.  James Madison said, “I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.”

When we allow the government to be responsible for caring for the poor and needy we neglect our personal duty and thereby create an entitlement mentality.  A mentality that demands, I have a Right to what is yours.  A mentality that argues, I do not have to work for what I get, you owe it to me because you have.  NO, ten thousand times NO!  What you have earned is yours and I have no right to it.  What I have is mine and you have no right to it.  If I choose to share it with you that is my right and your blessing, but the government is never to be involved.

God bless you and God bless America!