I continue to believe in the American people although sometimes that is incredibly difficult.  I don’t trust the polls, but I do view them and take them into account when I am assessing the situation politically.  I weigh them and try to determine which bent they pollsters have ideologically.  I seek to know who did the poll, where the data came from, and if those producing the information have a revealed political agenda.  Facts matter and polls could be valuable if they are honest and unbiased in their questions.  However, few are.

When the Democrats reclaimed control of the House of Representatives after the 2018 elections, I expected much of what we have gotten.  I wondered if there would be any moderate Democrats (if there is such a creature) would speak out against the incredible shift to the far far far far left by the party.  I was pleasantly surprised that a few, precious few, did.  I wondered if the leading voices in the Democrat Party would listen and heed their cautions.  They did not, which was no surprise.

The Democrats had a noticeable if not sizeable advantage in favorability among the voting public prior to that election.  I wondered if they would squander their political capital as the Republicans have frequently done and blow it?  I cannot say for certain that they have, are, or will but there are signs that encourage me that they are losing ground.  That is good for conservatives, constitutionalists, and the Republic. 

The Tsunami of Blue did not occur as they predicted but they did pick up over 40 seats as opposed to the Republicans who gained marginally in the Senate.  A recent poll that I saw suggested that the Blue advantage had vanished.

I include this poll because of its source.  You cannot accuse the pollsters of being heavily pro-Trump, this was the New York Times and Pew Research.  Many are suggesting that this shift must be laid at the feet of the Democratic 2020 presidential candidates.  There are specifics that can be referred to as catalysts but being deaf to America is the #1 in my view.

Of the Left’s key issues here’s what was reported:

Decriminalizing illegal border crossings – 67% viewed that as a bad idea while 27% thought it is a good idea.  Slavery reparations – 63% viewed that as a bad idea with 26% thinking it is a good idea. Replacing private insurance – 55% viewed that as a bad idea with 40% thinking it is a good idea.  Repeal Obamacare – 50% viewed that as a bad idea with 45% thinking it is a good idea.  (The Left is still winning on that last one. Why I will never understand.)

When it comes to the impossible Utopian dream of Free Everything the poll was interesting and disturbing:

Free Public College – 45% thought it was a bad idea and 51% a good idea.  $15 minimum wage – 42% thought it was a bad idea and 55% a good idea.  A Green New Deal – 34% thought it was a bad idea and 60% a good idea.  Millionaire Tax – 34% thought that was a bad idea and 61% a good idea. (Envy and Greed kicked in big time).  

Pathway to citizenship for illegals – 32% thought that was a bad idea and 63% a good idea.  (Goodbye America if that happens as the Democrats are proposing.)  Regulation of drug prices – 28% considered that a bad idea and 67% a good idea.  (What the government regulates it controls and it won’t stop with drug prices but distribution as well.) 

Voluntary Medicare for All – 26% thought that was a bad idea and 69% a good idea.  Gun background checks expansion – 10% considered that a bad idea and 88% a good idea.  (Know that the gun control and confiscation movement is picking up steam.)

Some of these make me wonder if people are thinking beyond the question.  Let me answer that, No, they are not!  Support for the Green New Deal is seemingly strong when those same people are asked about government control and cost, the support drops dramatically.  I wonder how the questions were posed and how much thought people put into their answers. 

I continue to hope that if the Democrats nominate someone like Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren that the public will immediately reject those extreme radical views and in the words of Nancy Reagan, ‘Just say No!’  The stakes are incredibly high in the 2020 presidential election.  Actually, it is high in all the elections.  If Biden wins the nomination, he might voice some more Left Center views and have some support that I believe Sanders and Warren would lose.  That is if the American people actually think for a millisecond.

We are facing a crisis in America politically and if we fail to defeat the Leftist, Activists, Globalists, Socialists, Democrats we will watch the incredible destruction of much of our Republic if not its complete demise.  Call me an Alarmist, I don’t care.  I see the danger and I’m not chicken little yelling that the sky is falling and do not have my finger poked in the hole in the dam.  The threat is real, and it is imperative that we pray like never before, work tirelessly, and above all Vote and Vote for America and against the Destruction of the Republic proposed by the Left.

God bless you and God bless America!

Hypocrisy is too kind, but since I refuse to use obscenities it must suffice in my description of what is happening today politically.  Calling the coup against Trump and the attempts to overturn the 2016 election a Witch Hunt is too kind, but it too must suffice.  We have spent millions if not billions of taxpayer funds in pursuit of fallacious intelligence and investigations into the president’s so-called collusion with foreign governments to subvert our electoral process. 

Someone recently argued, “Well we spent millions investigation Benghazi too.”  We did, and tragically nothing was done about it.  Therefore, I don’t care if it is an investigation by the Republicans or Democrats if there is nothing forthcoming to help us drain the swamp, then what’s the benefit to America?  The only perceived benefit is in the minds of the politicians as they hope those expenditures will endear them to the voters and facilitate their ascension to power or allow them to remain in power.  That is tragic for America.

The current phase of the Coup to oust President Trump and overturn the 2016 election or to win the 2020 election should be laughable but it is so dangerous it is diabolical.  The blatant lies of Congressman Adam Schiff of California should result in immediate action by Congress, but it won’t.  I say that because the factual evidence clearly reveals that too many in both parties are swamp denizens and far more interested in CYA than getting to the truth. We are secondary in their concerns and America is only a tool for them to achieve their objectives and agendas.

The pretend conversation between Trump and the Ukraine president as presented by Congressman Schiff was deemed a parody.  However, the Congressman intended it to be a representation of factual evidence and designed to sway voters to their side.  If Trump says anything, to them, he is a liar and the worst human being to have ever lived.  That is beyond tragic and helps to expand the divide in America pushing it nearer and nearer the uncrossable chasm that will destroy us.  I condemn that kind of activity by either side and pray for us to once again learn to listen and pursue peace with principled purpose.

We know that the so-called whistle-blower did not follow proper protocol and report to the Intelligence Committee Inspector General (ICIG) his contact with Congressman Schiff or his staff.  That makes it suspect and smells of collusion and an attempt to hide the truth.  I believe it was more than a nervous oversight as some have argued.  I believe it was intentional.  That is cause for concern or should be. 

The whistle-blower reportedly told the ICIG, Michael Atkinson, that he was a registered Democrat and had a prior working relationship with a prominent Democratic politician. That Democratic candidate has been revealed to be none other than Joe Biden. Imagine that!  That too is cause for me to be suspicious.  I would say the same thing if the whistle-blower were reporting on a Democrat and was a Republican operative.  I would say that, especially if the whistle-blower did not have ‘direct knowledge’ of what he was blowing the whistle on.  That is, at best, hearsay and at worst, a blatant fabrication in the style of the Steele dossier. 

I find it amazing and unbelievable that the ICIG would say that he did not know how the Schiff tweet in August and other statements by the Congressman appear to reflect the content of the whistle-blower complaint.  Well, Mr. ICIG, maybe you should find out.  The tweet and other statements contained classified information, a violation of federal law, but the ICIG seemed to be unconcerned about that deviation from legality.  I wonder why?

Schiff had previously contended, “we have not spoken directly to the whistleblower.”  Was he saying that he personally had not?  We know that his staff had and had conveyed the information to the Congressman.  Therefore, to consider the Congressman forthcoming and honest in this matter would be a stretch.

It is interesting that a ‘fact-checker,’ Glenn Kessler, who has been quite anti-Trump would call the Congressman out for ‘blatant lies’ regarding the whistle-blower complaint.  When Schiff was asked: “Have you heard from the whistle-blower? Do you want to hear from the whistle-blower? What protections could you provide to the whistle-blower?” [Sam] Stein, an MSNBC contributor, asked on “Morning Joe.”

“We have not spoken directly with the whistle-blower. We would like to,” Schiff responded. “But I am sure the whistle-blower has concerns that he has not been advised, as the law requires, by the inspector general or the director of national Intelligence just how he is supposed to communicate with Congress, and so the risk to the whistle-blower is retaliation.”

Mr. Kessler said that Schiff’s response was ‘flat-out false.’  I do believe that would make it a LIE!  Mr. Kessler noted at least two other instances where Schiff was dishonest.  One of them was during an interview with CNN Reporter Anderson Cooper and the other during a Capitol Hill Press Conference.  He is being dishonest now in the secret hearings trying to pressure witnesses to change their story. Corruption is visible! But, since Mr. Schiff is the Chair of the House Intelligence Committee, an avid anti-Trump Leftists, he was using Parody not telling Lies, right?  That’s what they want us to believe.  I do not!  A Lie is a Lie no matter where, when it is told or who tells it!

The New York Times, a propaganda arm of the Democrats acknowledged that the whistle-blower gave an early account of allegations against President Trump to a House aide who outlined it to Representative Adam Schiff, who is now leading an impeachment inquiry.  Brit Hume of Fox News responded: “This puts the whole impeachment inquiry in a new light.  There is no getting around the appearance that collusion-truther and Trump antagonist Schiff was a partner in this from the start.”

America, we have a clear choice in November 2020.  It is not simply a vote between Republican and Democrat but we are facing diabolical evil. We either vote for those who support infanticide, eradication of our borders, the dissolution of our Republic, transforming us into a Socialist nation, and taxing us into oblivion or we vote to reject them.  I have made my choice!  I am voting against destruction and voting for America.  I am voting for Faith, Family, and Freedom and will vote NO on the Democrats in November 2020.  Please join me in voting for America!

God bless you and God bless America!

Before you get your underwear tied up in knots find out what I can support them in.  I believe that you just might join the chorus “Just Do It.”  Okay, enough with the tease, what am I talking about and what can I support her and them in?  In Not Reproducing!  No, I do not mean that everyone stop reproducing but those following the extreme lunacy of toxic liberalism and advancing the hysteria of Climate Change and taking their anti-American positions.  Please, stop reproducing!  Just Do It don’t talk about doing it, DO IT!

She made a statement recently that is a slap in the face of all the WWII Generation saying that “bad-ass” Millennials are the true greatest generation.  Seriously?  This 29-Year Old Ex-Bartender is the final authority on what generation is the greatest and why?  I think not, and her continual drivel and diatribe are further reasons that I say, Please Don’t Reproduce!  Ms. Ocasio-Cortez please follow the fear of your heart about having a family and don’t. 

I know that sounds a bit harsh and I may have to repent over it, but if she truly believes the lunacy she keeps advancing, the thought of her raising children is terrifying.  Imagine what they would be like ideologically.  She claims that Climate Change is waking her up in the middle of the night causing terror in her heart and mind.  Hey, I am awakened in the middle of the night frequently, but it is not fear of Climate Change that is causing it.  Most of the time it is the urge to go and empty my full bladder.  I wonder if we took the actions, she suggests would that solve that issue for me? 

She has stated that she fears there are untold numbers of ancient deadly diseases hidden with the glaciers.  She is petrified that if the glaciers melt those diseases will be set free to destroy humanity.  Of course, she uses a hypothetical that some in the scientific community have stated that there might be some dormant diseases locked in the frozen-ice of the glaciers.  I wonder, does she truly live in such paranoia and fear that she wants all of us to be traumatized over what might be if?  The “if” is the problem, the “if” is not based on science, fact, or data.  The “if” is in her head and she wants us to share her paranoia.  Thanks, but no thanks.  I face enough real problems to live in fear of ‘what if’?

She has argued that Climate Change is going to cause the oceans to rise to dangerous levels and swallow up entire cities.  She has contended that the warming of the planet and the melting ice is going to cause a massive increase in the mosquito population which will infect millions with new deadly diseases. 

Those are just some of her tales of terror that the evil lurking danger of Climate Change is going to bring on humanity if we don’t stop it.  After all, we only have about a decade to handle the climate.  As if we could control the climate, but we had better hurry before it is too late.  I wonder if she has been prescribed with powerful anti-depressants?  If not, Ms. AOC I suggest head to the nearest E.R. and get some medication immediately.  I don’t want you to have a nervous breakdown because of your irrational fears.

I agree with others who have said, “If I believed that Climate Change would truly cause a dangerous rise in sea levels to the point that it would flood both coasts and destroy entire cities, I’d be more inclined to join her.  If I believed that entire cities would be underwater, and the result of Climate Change would be the unleashing of new deadly diseases upon the world, I might become paranoid too.”  However, I do not, and I do not for two reasons:  The Bible and Factual Data.

There is scientific data to support the notion that the earth has warmed over the last century, but not as she chants and to the degree she insists.  In fact, the scientific data indicates that the recent warming has made humanity better off not resulted in catastrophic disaster.  There is no evidence that the sea levels are rising enough to produce any genuine concern.  But, AOC, and Al Gore along with scores of others are insisting we are on the brink of destruction and Climate Change is Public Enemy Number One. 

Think about the fact that over the past few millenniums the earth has emerged from the ‘Ice Age’ and the warming has produced immeasurable benefits that continue today.  Agriculture has benefited and thereby humans are better off with higher crop yields to satisfy the needs of an increasing world population.  Global plant life has increased, and the warming has reduced the deadly bitter cold that is estimated to kill 20 times more people than higher temperatures.  Does that sound catastrophic? 

Let me offer this little tidbit from Patrick Michaels, Ph.D., and a former fellow at the Cato Institute.  He said, “we don’t live in the best of all possible climates, so what’s happened as it’s warmed this half a degree in the late 20^th Century and the CO2 has gone up, what we have done is created a greener planet and the greening of the planet is profound.”  Does that sound catastrophic?

Joe Bastardi, chief meteorologist at weatherbell.com stated, “in the fossil fuel ear, in spite of a four-fold increase in the population, the number of deaths related to climate has plummeted.”  Wait.  That can’t be, right?  Not with the alarm that is being sounded by the ‘settled science’ crowd of the ‘unsettled science’ world, like AOC, Al Gore, and all the Democrats wanting to be President.  But facts are stubborn things and it is a fact so deal with it AOC and alarmists.

They want to force us to abandon all fossil fuels and nuclear energy in favor of the costly and unreliable Green Energy.  The empirical data is that conventional power plants and nuclear plants last longer than solar and wind facilities.  That means more cost, less availability, and unreliability.  But I would like to ask, “Where does she or the Greenies think that all the rare earth minerals that would be required to build those facilities they propose would come from?” 

Tragically, frequently the only place to get those minerals is from countries with abysmal human rights records, like the Congo.  Millions of animals have been killed and millions of acres of land destroyed with significantly higher costs and the use of child labor are the result of their proposals.  Doesn’t that sound peachy?       

Although Global Warming may cause some problems for humans, it will never cause as many problems as the Leftist Agenda housed in the New Green Deal.  The innovations and benefits derived from any shift in climate will far outweigh the problems cause to humans and we will work our way through it.  I support keep the planet as environmentally clean as possible and being good stewards of our resources. At the end of the day my position is I trust God and therefore I refuse to live in fear.

So, I conclude by saying, “I support AOC and the Liberal Left in their decision to not reproduce.”  I am chanting, “Just Do It!  Just Do It!” I hope you hear the sarcasm in my words and realize that I wish no human ill.  I just weep for my nation and world over the paranoia and acceptance of the diabolical lies being advanced by the Climate Change Alarmist and Activists. 

God bless you and God bless America!

I never cease to be impressed by the incredible wisdom and detailed thought and care the Founding Fathers gave to the Constitution and the Republic.  Their wisdom far exceeded their times and produced a system of government and a document that has an incredible sense of timelessness.  In that blanket statement, I cover the entire document including the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence. 

However, there is one inclusion they placed in our Founding Documents that must never be lost.  The Electoral College must be preserved.  I am fully aware of the latest push and the attempt to reeducate and indoctrinate regarding that process.  Many of those insisting that we move away from it truly believe that we are a majority rule Democracy and do not grasp the concept of representative government.  They believe that, in all things, the majority must rule.  That is a recipe for destruction governmentally and in many areas of life.

If you are a parent, do you manage your home and your children using that principle?  If so, you either have or will have anarchy and chaos in the home.  Your children will learn no discipline and you will fail in your assignment to ‘train them in the way they should go.’  If you run a business do you operate under that principle and allow the employees to determine by majority vote the direction, work hours, and duty assignments?  If you do, your business is either failing or will fail miserably.  If the military, tasked with protecting this nation were to operate in that manner we would have been defeated long ago and would be under despotic tyranny now.

Those thoughts are not the prime target of my desired discussion today.  I want to address the Electoral College vs the Popular Vote.  There is a very serious move by the Left to do an end-run around the Constitution and subvert the process making the Popular Vote the deciding factor in all future presidential elections.  The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) is dangerously close to securing the strength to destroy our system of elections and plunge us into the abyss of political destruction. 

The NPVIC is nothing more than an arm of the Liberal Left seeking to give absolute power to the Democrat-dominated regions of this nation.  Namely, California, New York, and Chicago.  There are other sectors but those three alone would virtually always determine the outcome of the elections and those are all deeply steeped in the Democratic ideology. 

The pitch on the website of the NPVIC reads as follows:

The National Popular Vote interstate compact would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes across all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The bill ensures that every vote, in every state, will matter in every presidential election. The bill is a constitutionally conservative, state-based approach that preserves the Electoral College, state control of elections, and the power of the states to control how the President is elected.

Their objective would be achieved through a formal agreement in various states and control the needed 270 electoral votes and require their electors to vote for the candidate receiving the most popular votes in the election.  They would disregard the wishes of their own voters and require their electors to vote according to the national popular vote totals.  Thus far there are 15 states and the District of Columbia in that movement.  They control 196 electoral votes.  Only 74 more would be required to guarantee the election to the candidate receiving the most popular votes. 

I know you have seen it before but the NPVIC signatory states and the number of electors they control are:  California (55), New York (29), Illinois (20), New Jersey (14), Washington (12), Massachusetts (11), Maryland (10), Colorado (9), Oregon (7), Connecticut (7), New Mexico (5), Rhode Island (4), Hawaii (4), Delaware (3), Vermont (3), and the District of Columbia (3). 

There are seven additional states in which one legislative chamber has approved the measure and one in which both houses of the legislature have approved it.  If they pass the measure the NPVIC would decide who is president in all future elections.  Their movement conflicts with the Constitution and violates at least two constitutional provisions, including the 12^th Amendment.  They detail their objective in this manner:

The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President … and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate — The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all certificates and the votes shall then be counted . . . the person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed.

The 12^th Amendment was ratified specifically to prevent actions like that of the NPVIC from becoming reality.  There would be litigation if they succeed in forming their coalition and we lost the election as a result. What would happen? If the Democrats take control of both Houses of Congress and the White House, what would happen to the Supreme Court?  What would happen to the agreement of the NPVIC were the Democrats able to pack the court with liberal activist jurist?  You know the answer. The Constitution would be a moot point and our Republic would no longer exist. 

I contend that were this to pass and stand, the Democrats controlling those states would never cast their ballots for a Republican were he/she to win the popular vote.  Professor Norman R. Williams wrote in the Harvard Law Review:

[A] withdrawal from the NPVIC would violate the terms … but the Constitution trumps interstate compacts and does so whether Congress ratifies the NPVIC or not. And, sure, other states will undoubtedly sue to compel the withdrawing state to comply … but that lawsuit will likely fail for the reason just discussed. Even more importantly, the very fact that the presidential election would again be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court would again throw the nation into turmoil.

We are fighting for the survival of America and our Freedom.  You may believe that we should elect according to popular vote but if we did both coasts would determine the election and the rest of us would have no voice.  The electoral college is the only way to guarantee a representative vote and reflection of the wishes of All the States and People not just strongholds of one party or the other. 

I am voting No on the Democrats in 2020 and voting Yes for America.  God help us if we do not wake up and take a united and definitive stand for Freedom!

God bless you and God bless America!

I am an American beyond the age of 65 and when I look back on the avenues that were open to me in my earning years, I have some regrets.  I worked in the private sector, paid taxes, and had little beyond what I earned to invest.  I served in the military and spent a year in Vietnam in 1967 and had little to show for it other than love for my country.  I received Jesus as my personal savior and acknowledged the call to preach and began my Christian journey in the late ‘60s and was unaware of some avenues open to me. 

What avenues?  Regarding Social Security as a minister, I could have opted out of the program but was unaware of that option until it was too late.  Would I have invested, or could I have invested as I needed had I done that?  I can only speculate but had I invested one-third of what I paid into Social Security I would be far better off than I am now.  On one hand, I justified my paying Social Security Taxes so that my parents and others like them could continue to receive their meager checks each month.  It was literally all they had to live on and was barely sustainable.  But, they, with occasional help from their children, survived and for that I am grateful.

Social Security is a poorly managed Socialism Program that many of us paid into without any real options.  We do not consider it an “entitlement” as the other so-called entitlements of the federal government.  However, it is something that we are ‘entitled’ to because we paid for it with our hard-earned money.  We earned it!  We paid for it with our lives because time and money are the results of the investment of our lives.  We are offended when someone lumps Social Security into the same basket as Welfare, Food Stamps, and the many other federal programs that are identified as ‘entitlements.’  WE PAID!

I recognize and acknowledge that Social Security is a Socialism Program and a means by which the government and politicians can manipulate the masses of seniors.  That disturbs me.  The mismanagement and ineptitude of our federal government in investing our ‘contributions’ into the program is criminal.  Even a low-skilled investor could have produced a far better result than our supreme federal government has accomplished.  The theft of the funds from that program by politicians has virtually destroyed the program and some in the future will find that what they contributed has been confiscated, wasted, and they are left abandoned.  That is tragic!  No, it is criminal!

I read an article recently that insisted that it is a myth to say that the government raided the Social Security Trust Fund.  The writer’s argument was based on the assertion that there never was any money stashed away in a ‘trust fund’ for politicians to pilfer.  However, to fully ascribe to his argument it would take some incredible mental gymnastics to not see the mismanagement and abuse by the Treasury over the years. 

The Social Security Program, throughout its history, has taken in more revenue than it spent.  Many are unaware that the excess revenue is given by the Social Security Administration to the Treasury, year after year, to ‘meet its current spending and meet other budgetary obligations, even though those funds were specifically ‘earmarked for Social Security.’  That is nothing short of legalized theft and although there may not have been a specific trust fund, the funds were there, and the government spent them for purposes other than their intended purpose.  That is, in my view, Criminal.

The monies that the federal government through the Treasury spent that was earmarked Social Security is not drawing interest as some assert. It has been spent.  How does the Treasury pay the ‘so-called interest’ on the Social Security Funds it spends?  In 2017, the SSA revealed that benefits were financed by $873 Billion in payroll taxes and $85 Billion in ‘interest’ paid by the Treasury.  But the Treasury concluded 2017 with a $666 billion budget deficit. 

So how did the Treasury pay the interest?  The federal government lawfully, not ethically, uses all its revenue sources to pay all its liabilities. They are supposed to do that even if that revenue was designated and promised to another purpose or before taking on new debt.  Neither of those comes into play for the politicians and they play fast and loose with our Social Security funds. 

Those funds were promised to us and were supposedly kept secure. So much for the government telling the truth and not pilfering from us.  In short, there can be no repayment of principal when there are no funds and the government has spent the funds.  Simply, it is fictional math that they use to repay what they have taken or borrowed from the Social Security Program.  That spells doom and disaster for the program.

The Country Group, The Tractors has a song that says, “We may not be broke, but we are badly bent.”  Some argue that Social Security is not going bankrupt it is simply running out of funds.  That sounds a wee-bit deceptive and my view is that if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and looks like a duck, it is most likely a duck and Social Security are being bankrupted by the politicians who steal our money to buy more votes in other areas.

Congress has no concern about the failing Social Security Program because they have lucrative Congressional Pensions and healthcare to rely on.  Social Security ‘benefits’ are an earned right that those of us who have paid into realize and want protected.  The problem we face is not whether some politician will fix the program but how they will destroy it. 

The Criteria for eligibility for any government benefit (Social Security included) could change on the whims of politicians at any moment.  I am 100% convinced that the pathway the political elite will use to ‘fix’ Social Security is through changes in eligibility and phase people out of the program due to the lack of funds.  Funds that are lacking because they have mismanaged or stolen them.  That is criminal!

There is the projection that only 76% of the current benefits will be available to retirees in 2035.  That may not be ‘bankruptcy’ in the strictest definition, but it will be devastating.  We need to move to a program where younger people can invest in their own retirement rather than trusting the political system to manage it for them.  History reveals how inept the government is in virtually everything, why would money and retirement be different?

I am pro term-limits for Congress just as there is for the President.  I am very pro-tax cuts because it is good for the economy and the Republic.  I am pro-Free Market Capitalism and opposed to Socialism.  In short, I am conservative, a constitutionalist, a Christian, a patriot, and one willing to fight for Faith, Family, and Freedom with my all.

God bless you and let’s keep America Free and stop the Leftists in 2020.

I am serious!  I sometimes feel like Diogenes of Sinope searching for an honest man as I pursue political sanity in America. I am more than a little troubled by the intense hatred being spewed out in America today.  I am deeply disturbed by the willingness of the biased blindness to pursue fabrications in an attempt to achieve a political objective.  I am dumbfounded by the lack of cognitive reason being displayed by a very large swath of Americans today, politically.  It seems that we have adopted the inane and borderline insane and tossed reasoned sanity on the trash heap.  That is not dangerous it is deadly!

When politicians such as Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and others can take public positions, make open confessions, and demonstrate behavior that is, at best, borderline criminal and are ignored we are opening a dangerous can of worms.  When the very things those politicians on the Left do are used as allegations of ineptitude, incompetence, incoherency, and treason against the current president, we have abandoned sanity and reason.  That is not dangerous it is deadly!

In news cycles, any story that is more than a few days old is ancient history.  The ancient history story of the Ukraine Scandal has missed many important elements and ignored some pertinent facts.  I weep for my nation when those on the Right and on the Left, fraudulently, ignorantly, or willingly advance false narratives, hearsay, and unvetted ‘proofs’ of Trump’s guilt.  I weep because of their deviousness or ignorance and I weep because of the millions who believe the rhetoric without using a modicum of reason.  That is not dangerous it is deadly!

Joe Biden openly, on videotape, informed the world that he committed an act that should disqualify him from being president and possibly should result in an indictment.  That has been ignored and even justified by the media, the pundits, some Republicans, and all the Democrats in Washington.  Yet, they seek to impeach Trump over something far less egregious and the facts indicate it was not only within the scope of his office, our treaty with Ukraine, and benign.  But it was Trump and Trump must go, at least that seems to be their idea.  It sets a precedent that will destroy the office of President and make Congress the Ruling Power creating an unwanted Oligarchy!  That is not dangerous it is deadly!

Most ignore, do not know, or have forgotten the involvement of the DNC and Hillary in the elections seeking the aid of Ukraine to defeat and destroy Trump.  How has that escaped the media’s attention?  Oh, I know there was no room for it in their 24/7 rhetoric and agenda to destroy the evil Donald John Trump.  How short our memories are or how ignorant we are politically in America. 

There was the DNC Contractor or Consultant, Alexandra Chalupa who was hired to ‘solicit dirt’ on Trump’s campaign manager Paul Manafort.  That bit of information came directly from Ambassador Valeriy Chaly.  He reported, “Chalupa sought the Manafort dirt and hoped to get it before Congress.”  Chalupa later tried to arrange for Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to comment on Manafort’s Russian ties on a U.S. visit during the 2016 campaign.  Those efforts were rejected by the DNC appeal.  They said,“The Embassy got to know Ms. Chalupa because of her engagement with Ukrainian and other diasporas in Washington D.C., and not in her DNC capacity. We’ve learned about her DNC involvement later, The Embassy representatives unambiguously refused to get involved in any way.”

In a meeting in March 2016, Chalupa told Telizhenko that the DNC wanted to collect evidence that Trump, his organization and Manafort were Russian assets working to hurt the United States.  She suggested to the Ukrainian Ambassador that they hoped to find anything they could introduce to Congress in September 2016.  Could they have been hoping for an ‘October Surprise’?  They stated their hoped to have Trump removed from the Ballot at that time.  Of course, that would have guaranteed the Democrat win because no Republican could be presented with enough time to fully launch a campaign.  That is devious and diabolical.  That kind of action and attitude is not dangerous it is deadly!

Ukraine has issued information that reveals President Barack Obama attempted to pressure their government to drop the investigation.  He told the Ukraine prosecutor general that he did not need to investigate a supposed anti-corruption group, the Anti-Corruption Action Centre (AntAC), and the misuse of $4.4 million in U.S. aid to fight corruption.  Instead, Obama gave them a list of people they should prosecute!  Wait, doesn’t that go far beyond any suggestion by Trump to investigate? 

Ukraine understood the message to be clear.  It was a warning, “Don’t target AntAC in the middle of an American presidential election in which George Soros was backing Hillary Clinton.”  A Ukrainian official said, “We ran into a buzz saw and got bloodied.”  How is that okay but Trump’s actions the most-vile in history?  That mindset and pathway is not dangerous it is deadly!

America, if we allow the Liberal Leftists, the Socialist, Progressives, and Globalist to reclaim the White House and the Congress in 2020 we do so to our own destruction.  We are walking on very thin ice and on very dangerous grounds politically, constitutionally, and our Freedom and Liberty is hanging in the balance.  No, Trump is not America’s greatest threat, the Democratic Agenda is!   WAKE UP AMERICA!

God bless you and God bless America!