THE POWER OF THE PURSE


Blog Post - Purse

Congress has the “power of the purse” to stop many of the illogical, illegal, unnecessary and unconstitutional expenditures, programs and bureaucracies exist in Washington and across America.   Unfortunately the Republicans have allowed the media, the current administration and the Democrats to advance the false narrative about what actually happens and cower in fear refusing to use the only real tool they have to stop the runaway train of destruction that has been unleashed.

If the Republicans were to pass a continuing resolution to temporarily fund the government and the president were to veto it one should know that “crucial services continue without interruption”.  That is completely contrary to what is being advanced every time the budget comes up and the Republicans fail to articulate the counter to the leftist narrative and fear that is heaped on the public.  There is no interruption in services necessary for national defense and law enforcement.  Those services and payments that are mandatory such as Social Security and Veterans’ benefits continue uninterrupted contrary to the fear tactic used by the president.

Under Article I of the Constitution, “No money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in the consequence of appropriations made by law.”  We have the Antidefenciency Law (ADA), which makes it illegal for federal officials to spend one dime in excess of appropriations or to obligate the government to enter into contracts before an appropriation has been passed to pay for the commitment or contract.  This law prevents government employees from volunteering their services “free of charge” except in specific situations that affect, “the safety of human life or the protection of property”.  That is so loosely interpreted it is almost meaningless.

Blog Post - Shutdown

WHAT DOES NOT SHUT DOWN?

 The Congressional Research Service reports that there is an OMB memorandum for 1981 that gives examples of functions that continue during a funding lapse or “shutdown”.

  • National security, including the conduct of foreign relations essential to the national security or the safety of life and property;
  • Benefit payments and the performance of contact obligations under no-year or multi-year appropriations or other funds remaining available for those purposes;
  • Medical care of inpatients and emergency outpatient care and activities essential for the safe use of food, drugs, and hazardous materials;
  • Air traffic control and other transportation safety functions;
  • Border and coastal protection and surveillance;
  • Protection of federal lands, buildings, waterways, and other property of the U.S.;
  • Care of prisoners and others in federal custody;
  • Law enforcement and criminal investigations;
  • Emergency and disaster assistance;
  • Activities essential to the preservation of the money and banking system of the U.S., including borrowing and tax collection;
  • Production of power and maintenance of the power distribution system; and
  • Protection of research property.

 

In 2011 they went beyond those basic services and listed others that would continue.  Truthfully most of the government would function and it would be business as usual during that time.

The key for the Republicans is that if they allowed funding to expire then it would be incumbent on the Democrats to find 60 votes in the Senate to refund those programs and if they could not the program could be allowed to die.  Why not use the “power of the purse” and put the onus back on the Democrats rather than hiding in fear afraid of your own shadow.  Do what you were elected to do!

God bless you and God bless America!

THE 14TH AMENDMENT DOES NOT GIVE BLANKET BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP…


14th Amendment

Illegal Immigration and Amnesty are not secondary issues in this presidential campaign as Bret Baier of Fox News seems to think.  It is an economic issue, national security issue, national sovereignty as well as a social issue.  At one time I thought that if a person was born in the United States they were automatically afforded citizenship by the Constitution of these United States.  As a student of history in college and over the past 40 plus years I have discovered the writings of the authors of the 14th Amendment and their view of what that amendment actually was designed to do.

The 14th Amendment, as per Senator Jacob M. Howard of Michigan in 1866 wrote, “…every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States.  This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.” 

Blog Post - Senator Howard

Subject to the jurisdiction does not simply mean being in the country physically but means “not owing allegiance” to any other foreign nation.  It is not just the physical jurisdiction but the complete jurisdiction of the United States of America.  Illegals cannot make that claim for they are ILLEGAL.  In 1866 Senator Edward Cowan wrote, “A foreigner in the United States has a right to the protection of the laws; but is not a citizen in the ordinary acceptance of the word…”  The words “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” was intended to exclude American-born persons from automatic citizenship whose allegiance to the United States was not complete.  The Native Americans were not initially included although born here because it was not perceived that their allegiance was not complete to the United States but to their own tribal councils.  With regard to illegal aliens in the United States unlawfully, their native country has a claim of allegiance on the child.  Therefore, the completeness of their allegiance to the United States is impaired and precludes automatic citizenship.  The proper interpretation of the 14th Amendment is that an illegal alien mother is subject to the jurisdiction of her native country, as is her baby.

In the “Slaughter-House Cases” the Supreme Court confirmed this restricted interpretation of citizenship.  In 1884 Elk v. Wilkins, the phrase, “subject to its jurisdiction” was interpreted to include “children of ministers, consuls, and citizens of foreign states born with the United States.”  In Elk, the American Indian claimant was considered NOT an American citizen because the law required him to be “not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction and owing them direct and immediate allegiance.”  The Courts essentially declared that the status of the parents determines the citizenship of the child.  To qualify children for “birthright citizenship”, based on the 14th Amendment, parents MUST owe, “direct and immediate allegiance” to the United States and be “completely subject” to its jurisdiction.  Simply, they must be citizens of the United States of America.

Blog Post - Birthright

The argument that just being born here automatically affords “birthright citizenship” in the United States is to ignore the wording and intent of the Amendment.  One cannot simply self-immigrate ILLEGALLY and then claim jurisdiction because they are here.  They are citizens of another country and subject to the jurisdiction of that country.  They become subject to our laws but that does not give them citizenship.  The Civil Rights Act of 1866 defined citizens of the United States as, “all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding American Indians not taxed.”  The question of American Indians Senator Howard argued, “…have always been in our legislation and jurisprudence, as quasi foreign nations”. Senator Lyman Trumbull (D-IL) agreed with Senator Howard stating, “…it would be a violation of our treaty obligations… to extend our laws over these Indian tribes with whom we have treaties saying we would not do so.”  Trumbull insisted that the Indian tribes WERE NOT subject to our jurisdiction in the sense of owing allegiance solely to the United States.  He stated, “…it is ONLY those persons who come completely within our jurisdiction, who are subject to our laws that we think of making citizens.”

Blog Post - Anchor

The clincher in this is that in Section 5 of the 14th Amendment it reads:  “The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.”  That includes Section 1 deemed the “citizenship clause”.  Would Congress pass legislation granting “birthright citizenship” to the children of illegal aliens?  Do wild bears live in the woods?  If they follow the arguments of the authors of the clauses and amendment they would not but if they follow present day political correctness they would.  What do you think would be the case if the Democrats and RINO’s control the White House and/or Congress?  You get the Gold Star it would be Amnesty and Anchor Baby Citizenship automatically.

            May God bless you and God bless America again!

 

WHAT AM I LOOKING FOR IN 2016???


Blog Post - 2016

Recently someone asked, “Roy, what are you looking for in 2016 politically?”  I’m glad they qualified the question or I would have answered quite differently.  The question was not what do I expect to happen but what I am looking for or want to happen in 2016 politically.  One reflects my hope and desire the other would reflect what I see in the Spirit and what I am concerned is coming down the pike in America and the world.

Watching the Republican Debate (Audition) a number of things flooded into my mind and I am still reflecting on them.  The one thing that I came away with was what I would like to see in America nationally 2016 and beyond.  I am constantly thinking and rethinking what I believe to be critical politically as well as socially, economically, in National Defense and spiritually.  A number of the candidates offered hope that these things might somehow become part of the GOP platform in 2016 but that would largely depend on the nominee.  If it is another mainstream establishment moderate to liberal the GOP nominates hope goes out the window, but if the nominee is a constitutional conservative there is hope.  I have identified a small number who would qualify as truly constitutional conservatives, some I’m still vetting and some who are polar opposites of that ideological position.

Blog Post - Looking

WHAT AM I LOOKING FOR???

GOVERNMENT…

I want to see the size and scope of the federal government reduced dramatically and agree with Rand Paul and a couple others that I’d like to see it so small you hardly notice but that is not going to happen.  Reduced?  Possibly.  Reduced to that size?  Not a Chance. 

I want to see the deficit and spending reduced dramatically and the budget balanced but there are some caveats I must include.  I do not want a balanced budget that uses “baseline budgeting” for that will mean spending is not curtailed even if the budget is somehow balanced.  I want and “zero based budgeting” where we start a zero not where we were last year and give the automatic 5-10% increase and if we reduce the amount of automatic increase call it a cut.  IT IS NOT A CUT it is a paper manipulation that affords opportunity for spin and rhetoric.

I want to see entitlements dramatically reduced and provide a pathway to a person bettering themselves not becoming a professional recipient of government handouts.  Call me whatever you want that is destructive to America, the American dream and human dignity.  Making it more appealing to sit on one’s duff and receive a check than work is morally and fiscally wrong.

MILITARY.

I agree with numerous candidates that we MUST have a strong military and provide them with whatever tools, equipment and weapons needed to protect and defend this nation and our national sovereignty.  However, while I disagree with Senator Paul on funding the military I do agree that we need to do it while reducing and/or eliminating the incredible waste that exists in military spending.  We need to control the proverbial $700 hammer and $150 nut or bolt.  There is incredible waste that we could eliminate and thereby reduce the money given to the military while increasing our national defense and making the military stronger.  That being said, we MUST have a strong military!

AMNESTY.

I do not agree with Jeb Bush or John Kasich and some others that we need to just turn our heads and ignore those here ILLEGALLY.  I also, understand that it is a problem to uproot families and split them.  We must SECURE THE BORDER, first and foremost and after the border is secured we can then work through what we do with the millions of illegals.  It is not a cut and dried problem, in my mind, but it is not as complicated as some would desire to make it.   I agree that it is not humane to ignore our laws and allow a flood of illegals from wherever who want to do whatever in our country.  We are either a nation maintaining its sovereignty or we are not and to fail to protect and secure our borders and enforce our laws would be an assault on law abiding American citizens.

STOP THE MADNESS.

Whether it is global warming/climate change, political correctness run amok or a hell-bent desire to force us into Socialism if not Marxism or Communism must end.  We have more civil unrest in America today than when Barack Obama was inaugurated as president.  It is not by chance this has occurred it is by design and this administration has facilitated the escalation.  We should be light years down the road to energy independence and interpersonal and ethnic relations should be improving rather than digressing.  I am convinced the left wants unrest for it fuels the fire which drives their ideological agenda.  They need an angry base to insure voter turnout, political and economic pressure.  Without it, they would lose every election and every ideological argument.

Blog Post - Solution

I do not believe that isolationism is conservatism but rather that it is dangerous.  I do not want us to be the World Police but I do want us to protect and defend our national security and have the backs of our allies in the interest of world peace.  I fully believe that we have the best opportunity to achieve and maintain peace through strength not weakness.  I do believe that our economy could be advanced rapidly if Government’s fingers were dramatically removed from the pie.  I fully support a total elimination of the Internal Revenue Service and believe we can best achieve that via a “Flat” or “Fair/Consumption” tax.

The problems we face are complex and the solutions are not easily placed in a few paragraphs.  However, I believe that if Christians were to truly adopt 2 Chronicles 7:14 as our guide and make it a reality in our lives we would see the hand of God move powerfully.  Would that eliminate the need for our involvement?  No it would not but would provide a base from which to achieve the desired result.  I have contended for a long time that what we need from believers is:  Repent, Return and Prayer. 

America we are on the brink of victory or destruction and what we do in the next few months will largely if not completely determine that.  God bless you and God bless America!

THE PHARISEE – Self Righteous Regulator…


Spiritual Blog - Good Works

Colossians 2:20-23 – “Therefore, if you died with Christ from the basic principles of the world, why, as though living in the world, do you subject yourselves to regulations —  21 “Do not touch, do not taste, do not handle,” 22 which all concern things which perish with the using — according to the commandments and doctrines of men? 23 These things indeed have an appearance of wisdom in self-imposed religion, false humility, and neglect of the body, but are of no value against the indulgence of the flesh.”  NKJV

 

Through the years of Christian service I have encountered a number of modern day Pharisees.  Truthfully, I was one of the best early in my Christian walk.  I did not mean to be a Pharisee and did not believe I was a Christian bully but I was and when I saw it I wept before the Lord repenting and asking the Lord to help me reject legalism and become the person He desired.  I am still becoming and never want to stop growing in His love and likeness. 

The apostle Paul clearly identifies that if we are IN CHRIST we have been set free from the Laws of Sin and Death.  He reminds those in his audience the fallacy and danger of subjecting oneself to man-made regulations that have no true redemptive value.  In the former days I described above, it made me feel good to compare myself with others and declare, “I don’t do that.”  I gave me a false sense of humility, holiness and purity but as Jesus declared in Matthew 23:25, I was simply washing the outside of the cup but inside I was dirty.  Oh, please understand I loved the LORD deeply and wanted to please Him above all else but I was deceived placing value on the outward that God never placed and honoring regulations above grace without knowing I was doing so.

I recall once preaching in a church and after the service a group went out for lunch.  As I recall virtually everyone at the table had Iced Tea to drink and when it came time for desert I asked for a cup of coffee.  I knew I had done something terribly wrong by the gasps and looks of disdain on many faces at the table.  One of the deacons looked me in the eye and said, “I won’t be back tonight to hear a hypocrite preach” to a chorus of Amen from others at the table.  I was stunned.  On the way back to the home of the pastor he told me what the uproar was about and how he and the congregation viewed coffee as nectar of the devil and should be avoided.  (They drank tea!)  By the reaction of the people in the restaurant you would have thought I asked for a shot of Jim Beam or asked the waitress to go to bed with me.  Remember I was a Pharisee too on many fronts but not that one.

I have long pondered the things I condemned as a Pharisee and how those condemnations only served to satisfy my self-righteousness and had no redeeming value.  I would hear people condemn those who worked on Sunday but would gather at the restaurant after church for lunch.  Many would condemn indulgences of one kind or another and be guilty of overeating.  How many have criticized others for some moral failure while participating in spreading rumors and gossip?   The Pharisee is a self-righteous regulator of all lives but their own. 

Spiritual Blog - Pharisee

I have long prayed that the LORD help me to not be a Pharisee and expose to my heart those areas I am deficient.  I want to LOVE everyone.  I do not mean you have to condone lifestyles contrary to the biblical guidelines but you are to demonstrate love.  Years ago, the Holy Spirit instructed me saying, “Some things you are not to do.”  I took that to mean I was to tell others and He said, “This is for your personal edification not for you to attempt to regulate the behavior of others.”  Do not take that to mean I am passive about things I believe the Bible identifies as sin.  I have come to understand that, like fishing, I first catch the fish then clean them.

            God bless you as you go through your day!

The Government Didn’t Give and It Has No Right to Take Away – LIFE, LIBERTY AND…


Blog Post 1 - Life

The American Declaration of Independence lists as included in man’s unalienable Rights, ‘Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.’  It declares that all men (people) are ‘created’ equal and it recognizes our ‘Creator.’  I find it impossible to view the founding documents and conclude that the Founding Fathers considered Government all powerful.  No!  Their writings made it incredibly clear they considered man a creation of God possessing certain unalienable rights inherent in their existence.

blog Post 1 - Life 1

            They recognized the sanctity of LIFE and that the Right to LIVE was God-given not Government given.  I am alive not because of some governmental edict or law but because God placed in the hearts of a young couple living in Pasadena, Texas to continue their procreation.  I came into being on planet earth because of God not Government.  The government might want to give me life in prison or worse but they did not and cannot give me LIFE in the natural or spiritual for that is the handiwork of God and God alone.

Blog Post 1 - Liberty

            They recognized the individual and collective right of LIBERTY as being an unalienable right given by our Creator not Government.  Government almost never seeks to expand Liberty but restrict.  The Founding Fathers recognized that within the heart of man was not only a desire for Liberty but a Liberty that could not be achieved by governmental edict.  The Constitution of these United States recognized LIBERTY as being an individual right to be protected as described in the Declaration of Independence and Constitution.  They were casting off what they considered tyranny and oppression.  They were casting off what they views as actions, edicts, laws and regulations that suppressed LIBERTY.  They believed, as should we, that LIBERTY was a God-given right that no government anytime has a right to supplant or suppress.

Blog Post 1 - Happiness

            They recognized that the individual had a God-given right to PURSUE HAPPINESS.  The very idea, as presented by some today, that government can make all equal and essentially all happy is not only foreign to the founder’s views it is impossible.  It is not a contradictory view to say that all are not equal in talent, abilities, desire, drive, ingenuity, entrepreneurial spirit, creativity, ambition or intelligence but all created equal.  Most of those are developed characteristics not things the government can provide.  The very idea of EQUALITY as prescribed and pursued by government renders null and void all ambition, education, talent, creativity and excellence.  It reduces everyone to the lowest level rather than elevating everyone to the highest.  You cannot elevate to the highest in intelligence and creativity those who squalor in laziness therefore if the playing field is to be leveled it will be to the lowest rung on the ladder not the middle or highest for attaining that run requires effort, investment and involvement not HAND OUT.

God gave and our Founder’s recognized that we have a Right to LIVE, LIVE FREE and PURSUE HAPPINESS.  The constitution did not nor does God guarantee that everyone will be HAPPY only that we have the right to Pursue Happiness.  We have an incredible nation which was established on principles rooted deeply in the Bible and recognized man’s unalienable rights.  America was conceived and brought forth to produce a system of government in which man’s unalienable rights would NEVER be trampled or restricted.  Today’s liberal, progressive and elitist politician seek to make government not God the ALL POWERFUL force in our lives.  They seem to truly believe that Government giveth and Government has the right to take away.  Our evolving legislation has systematically and consistently removed God from the equation and resulted in the conditions we now find ourselves.

You and I have a Right from our Creator to LIFE, LIBERTY and the Pursuit of HAPPINESS.  When any man or government perceives their authority supreme, in that moment, they invalidated their legitimacy of governance.  It is time that we WAKE UP America and RECLAIM our government.  If we do not return to our founding principles which include a recognition of God’s sovereignty we will fail. Is there Hope?  I believe there is else I would cease my efforts to warn and awaken.  I would go into seclusion.  Can we succeed?  Yes!  Will we succeed?  I do not know!

            God bless you and God bless America!

THE AMERICA I WOULD RECREATE…


Blog Post 3 - America

            Wow!  Before you assume I, like the individual occupying the Oval Office, want to bypass the constitution, congress, courts or the American people and impose my vision upon the nation please pause a moment.  If you would be so kind as to allow me to explain, in a very limited fashion, my American vision I think you may largely agree with me.

The drive of both major political parties to CONTROL all branches of government cannot be overlooked and is part of, if not the primary reason, we are in the shape we are in today in America.  Let me state that one party controlling all branches of government is not good or bad in itself but the result has proven to be bad.  It is not necessarily desirable to have one party control the White House, another Congress and share the Courts that could be a good check and balance or could be meaningless as we have seen.

Blog Post 3 - America Destroyed

What would I create, if possible for America politically?  That is a great question and I’m so glad you asked.  The founding fathers hammered out a system of government in which they proposed and envisioned significant ‘checks’ and ‘balances’ to insure the Republic would stand and remain free and WE THE PEOPLE would be protected from internal tyranny.  They logically assumed that each branch would steadfastly defend their authority and thus provide a true ‘check’ and ‘balance’ to the other branches so no one branch would run roughshod over the others.  We have seen the failure of that in recent years for whatever reason so just having opposing parties control various branches is not a guarantee of good government or a Republican form of government with ‘checks’ and ‘balances.’

Having one party control the various branches of government of recent years gifted (or cursed) us with the Affordable Health Care Act aka Obamacare.  Republicans were locked out of negotiations and discussions on various issues and even told by the president, “Elections have consequences, you lost!”  We heard the infamous words of Nancy Pelosi, “We have to pass it to find out what’s in it.”  This highlights the danger of ONE PARTY RULE in Washington and certainly one party that is completely ideologically driven to the point of ignoring or despising the Constitution.  Even when the Republicans took back control of the House little was done to stem the runaway train of spending and a rogue executive branch.  The recent return of the Senate to the GOP has not greatly improved that issue so what is the solution?

Blog Post 3 - My America

HERE’S MY DESIRE AND DREAM FOR AMERICA…

The Executive Branch:

A president who so reveres the Constitution that even if he disagrees with its mandate he follows it.  If he wants a change he works with congress and the American people to either ratify a Constitutional Amendment to change the Constitution or a Law Congressionally passed to be signed into law that is within the guidelines of that document.  We have had limited visions of that in modern history but so seldom that most missed it completely.

A president who refuses to bypass Congress, ignore the courts and heeds the wishes of the American people.  One who will not abuse the Executive Order or Action in an attempt to skirt the constitutional guidelines or allow congress to provide ‘check’ and ‘balance’ oversight as designed by the constitution.  Sadly, presidents of both major parties have violated this to a greater or lesser degree and the American Republic suffers as a result.

A president who truly desires to be President of the Entire United States of America not just a political or ideological faction.

Congress:

A congress that recognizes its function and role as Representatives of WE THE PEOPLE not Overseers, Lords or Rulers of the populace.  A congress that will honor the constitution, follow the rule of law without fail regardless of personal ideological belief.  A congress that will staunchly defend and protect its constitutional authority rather than ceding it to a tyrannical executive.  A congress that honors the constitutional constraints on Big Government, limits taxation, spending and infringement upon our unalienable rights as citizens of the United States of America.  A congress that considers service in that branch of government a temporary duty rather than a lifelong job or an inherited right to rule as professional politicians.   Citizen Representatives!

Courts:

A Supreme Court that no longer affords lifetime appointments but limits it to a specified period of time.  A lifetime appointment has become an albatross rather than a benefit for rather than becoming apolitical the court has become partisan and whereas the lifetime appointment was supposed to free them from political pressure it has become a political weapon.  A court where the individuals set aside their personal political preferences and strictly honored the constitution of these United States of America.

Blog Post 3 - Constitutional America

That is not an exhaustive detail of my America but gives a brief overview of what I would like to see beginning in the 2016 Elections with regard to the occupant of the White House, Senate, House of Representatives and appointees to the Supreme Court.   I want the Republic that the founders envisioned, offered, and labored to provide.

God bless you and God bless America!

THE LEGISLATION PROBLEM OF LEGISLATION…


Blog Post 2 - Pork Barrell

           What in the world are you talking about Roy?  Have you noticed how many times a legislator acknowledges or it comes to light they did not READ the legislation before or after voting.  Yes, some of their staff researched it but I seriously doubt that even those truly or fully read the legislation and could articulate, debate or defend its nuisances.  Most of them are painfully unaware of what is in the legislation and that is problematic but not the only problem.

An additional issue is each piece of legislation that makes its way through the Halls of Congress, signed by the President and packed with pork has so many riders that NO ONE KNOWS the full extent or potential damage it can and will do.  I would venture to say that NO SINGLE PERSON or ENTITY knows what is actually on the books in America as laws or regulations.  That is a problem!  How can the public be expected to obey laws they are unaware of and those charged with enforcement are either unaware or unable to articulate and educate regarding?  HOW or better WHY?

 Blog Post 2 - Legislative Abues

IT WILL NOT HAPPEN but what we need is an Act of Congress and the People of America that demands each item stand on its own and then evaluated, debated, discussed, and if implemented funded as a STAND ALONE ITEM not a rider to fill the Pork Barrels of some legislator or special interest group.  This process has been crippling our American dream for decades and although I do not expect it to end I can dream.

The U.S. Senate follows much more tolerant rules of germaneness than the House of Representatives but both are ridiculous.  In State Houses 43 of the 50 states have provisions in their constitutions that allow a ‘line item veto’ of unwanted pork but that also serves as a political tool rather than preservation of the constitution and the best interest of the public.  Allowing the United States President ‘line item veto’ will not fix the problem so I am not proposing it.  The only real solution to the problem and verifiable way to know factually how each legislator voted on and item is to have STAND ALONE LEGISLATION where every department and bill has to be dealt with as a SINGLE ITEM not a rider and hidden in the volumes of budgetary items that will pass without much scrutiny.

It is a weapon that both parties use and a powerful tool in the legislative arsenal used to avail them to positions of power and an almost endless stream of finance personal and political.  Someone said, “We send a man to Washington who is not wealthy and he comes back a millionaire.”  If that were because of astute investment and entrepreneurial skills I would applaud them but it is most frequently because of Crony Capitalism, the Good Old Boy System, and the Brotherhood of Thieves in D.C. called politics.

Blog Post 2 - Report Card

Of course the problem I am addressing is often dismissed as a small issue but I suggest it would return politicians to being Public Servants and better serve the American people.  It would enable us to truly see if they were following their campaign commitments, honoring the constitution and fulfilling the duties of their offices.  It would affect, in a positive manner, our National Defense, Economy, and Foreign Policy making politics an entirely different animal and return power to the voting public where it should be.

You may not share my concerns and that is fine but I must ask if you would be interested in knowing the particulars, potential problems and cost of each piece of legislation your elected representative voted for or against?  They could be held accountable and responsible without being able to side-step and evade the issues and use the age old back door, “I didn’t know.”  No they would know, we would know and we would be better served.

God bless you and God bless America again!   My desire is a return to Constitutional Government and that for which I do battle!

REPUBLICAN ESTABLISHMENT WAR ON CONSERVATIVISM….


Blog Post - Republican Pinheads

I saw an article in the ultra-liberal Politico that cited a poll conducted by ‘so-called’ Republicans one group backed by the illustrious Karl Rove that reported women view the Republican Party as ‘intolerant’, ‘lacking in compassion’, and ‘stuck in the past.’ It declared that women are ‘barely receptive’ to Republican policies especially women in the Northeast and Midwest.

Keep in mind this was a poll conducted by Republicans and given to Politico. My immediate question was, “What was their objective?” It did not take long to find the answer. The solution to the problem according to the pollsters and Politico was for the Republican Party to distance themselves from the ‘Social Conservatism’ of the Tea Party. There is your answer! It was another Establishment Republican, which is largely led by Karl Rove, attack on the Tea Party and anything remotely conservative in the Republican Party. It is more of the Big Government segment of the party trying to eliminate the Tea Party and if successful will decimate the Republican Party, splinter it beyond repair, and likely lose any ground that could be gained in the mid-term elections and 2016.

Blog Post - Lessons Learned

It is not a matter of them ‘not learning’ their lesson it is a matter of them pursuing their core ideology which is virtually Democrat Lite and certainly not a Limited Government mentality. Karl Rove has never been a ‘small government’ man and his advice to George W. Bush helped steer Mr. Bush into a big government mode. Granted it was not as bad as that under Barack Obama but it was TERRIBLE.

Blog Post - Against Odds

When Ronald Reagan ran for President he and those backing him had to overcome the Republican Establishment and was able to do so because Mr. Reagan was a candidate that had some charisma, was articulate enough, truly believed in core conservative principles and wanted to limit government. That message resonated with the voting public and when coupled with the total disgust of Jimmy Carter’s liberal bungling administration enabled conservatism to win. It would again but the Establishment Republicans will fight it with all the money, influence, and media they have at their disposal. It will take a ‘grass roots’ effort that is well-coordinated, consistent, and determined to overcome their strangle hold on the party mechanics.

If we who view ourselves as supporters of the constitution, for limited government, anti-needless reckless spending, and conservative, hope to have a candidate that is not another John McCain or Mitt Romney we MUST and I mean MUST become involved. You do not have the luxury of sitting back and waiting for it to happen. You do not have the luxury of being a casual observer or spectator, not if you want to regain control of this country and return it to some semblance of being a Constitutional Republic. No, the days of being spectators are over if we care about freedom, liberty, the constitution, and the Republic. We must become involved at the precinct level and be active and vocal. If we are not willing to get our hands dirty with the day-to-day activities of politics we will concede this nation to the Democrats, Socialist, and RINO’s who all want somewhat the same thing – – BIG GOVERNMENT!

Blog Post - Freedom or Tyranny

My question to everyone is, “How much is Freedom, Liberty, and the Republic worth to you?” Our founding fathers had to answer that question and they choose liberty rather than tyranny. Many if not most of the colonist became involved in the process that became the revolution which produced the United States of America. People from all walks of life became engaged including the clergy. Today we face many of the same issues they faced although we have a Constitution and are supposedly free. The tyranny of the federal government is growing more pronounced and powerful with each passing day. How long do we have? I do not know but I know we cannot sit back hoping things will change without our involvement.

God bless you and God bless America!

ANARCHY IS COMING TO A STREET NEAR YOU…..


BLOG POST - Anarchy

The Bible says in Joel 2:28 that in the last days God would pour out His Spirit and the result would be that ‘old men’ would dream dreams and ‘young men’ would see visions. Joel’s prophesy repeated in Acts 2:17 and although you may completely disregard biblical references concerning the times and your theological beliefs regarding dreams and visions cause you to dismiss any such testimony. I do not know what you believe but I know over 16 years ago I experienced what can only be described as a vision concerning America and the coming chaos in our streets. I won’t get into that right now but want to address what I believe is THE COMING ANARCHY.

The etymology of ‘anarchy’ is interesting. ‘An’ signifies ‘without’ and ‘arkhe’ means ‘ruler or kingdom’ so together we have the word that means ‘without rulers’. I believe that we are rapidly heading toward ANARCHY in American cities and soon. The LAWLESSNESS of this administration, the DOJ, NSA, IRS, EPA, and an almost endless litany of governmental agencies viewed by the baser elements of society and some that are not so base as an ‘open invitation’ and a ‘reason’ to disregard the Law, the Constitution, and become LAWS UNTO THEMSELVES.

BLOG POST - Jefferson

Mr. Obama’s ‘pen and phone’ assault on the Constitution and the erasing of our borders is providing a breeding ground for TOTAL ANARCHY. Why would people who come to America ILLEGALLY on the open invitation of this administration in violation to the existing laws care about the law? If the President, the DOJ, Homeland Security, and others do not regard the Law, follow or respect it why should they? If the American Constitution is so disregarded as to allow the free flow of traffic of ILLEGALS without penalty why should it be viewed as anything important? It is not just the ILLEGALS that will cause ANARCHY but their insertion into the mix will help precipitate it and move it along much faster.

When these ILLEGALS become such a drain on our American economy and begin to erode the almost endless dollars for entitlements those now receiving the government dole will become angry like never before. They will view the demonstrated lawlessness of this administration as an open invitation to ‘do whatever you please’ and their sense of ‘entitlement’ will propel them into a false idea that they ‘have a right’ to what you have. They believe it is their right to have your possessions and if you refuse they will feel completely justified in ‘taking it by force’. The President would never admit that is where his policies are taking us but they are.

BLOG POST - Constitution
When the condition exists that cartels, gang members, terrorist, and average citizens openly ignore the Constitution and Laws provides a ready-made CAULDRON containing CHAOS and ANARCHY. I predict it is coming and part of me fully believes that this is the objective of this administration and president. It will plunge our nation into such chaos that he and his ilk will be able to take dictatorial authority, suspend the constitution, and demand total control in the name of restoring order. In this scenario there will be many who agree failing to realize that by allowing this rogue government to destroy our national sovereignty, erase our borders, ignore our constitution, and thumb their noses at our laws is dooming America the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave. Mr. Franklin’s statement that could be a question will be answered, “A Republic if you can keep it.” Can we keep it? We are the only ones who can answer that and at the present rate of decline and disinterest by the populace my answer would be NO! I pray that I am wrong but I know what I saw in the vision and see chaos and war in the streets of America.

Some will drop me like a hot potato for this post and others will relegate me to the ‘kook’, ‘conspiracy theorist’ corner, a few will just ‘shake their heads’, but a precious few will hear me and it will resonate with them. Those are the hope for America! I continue to call for legal, civil, and peaceful resistance to what is happening to America. We must get the attention of the legislators and the public and be willing to stand firm for the Republic called the United States of America.

I believe there is hope and yet I know that it will take a miracle to turn the tide. It will possibly take divine intervention and certainly a change in the mindset of people on both sides of the political spectrum. Tell me you are not political if you please but you will be when your Liberty and Freedom is totally stripped from you but then it will be too late. Politics and Faith are not oil and water they are LIFE.

May God help us and somehow save America. May He bless you and may He bless America again!

PRESIDENT NOT KING….


BLOG POST - No King
Maybe it is just me but have you noticed that the current occupant of the Oval Office seems to operate as though he were King of the United States of America not President of the United States of America. In America we have a ‘three branch’ system of government or we are supposed to according to the United States Constitution ratified by the States. However when the sitting president declares, “I have a pen and a phone” and “I am president I can do what I want” one realizes that the Constitution, Congress, Courts, and Constituents are meaningless to this individual and that is a Constitutional problem of epic proportions.
BLOG POST - U.S. Constitution
In the United States Constitution the first three articles outline the three branches of our government and list the powers and limitations they are supposed to adhere. Article II outlines the duties of the Executive Branch. Mr. Obama who claims to be a Constitutional Law Professor should go back and read this once more for he surely has forgotten the limitations. The United States President is elected to a four-year term by the electors from each state plus the District of Columbia. This is called the ‘electoral college’ and is comprised of 538 electors or a number equal to the number of Representatives and Senators in Congress. The citizens of each state vote for a slate of electors who vote for the president on the date established by Congress. In order to become president the requirements are specific. He/she must be a ‘natural born’ citizen not ‘naturalized’. He/she must be 35 years of age or older. Amendment XXII placed a two-term limit on the office of president. Not rocket science and something every child in junior high should know.

The President is Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces and has the power to call into service the state units of the National Guard, and in times of emergency may be given the power by Congress to manage national security or the economy. He/she has the power to make treaties with Senate approval. He/she is responsible for nominating the heads of governmental departments with Senate approval. He/she also nominates federal judges and the justices of the Supreme Court, again with Senate approval. He/she can issue pardons for federal offenses, can convene Congress for special sessions, can veto legislation approved by Congress. It is a limited veto not a line-item veto and a veto can be overridden by a two-thirds vote of Congress. The President is to deliver a State of the Union address annually to a joint session of Congress.

BLOG POST - Congress Holds Power
Congress holds the power to declare war yet he/she can send troops to battle without an official declaration of war. In 1973 the War Powers Act sought to define when and how the president could send troops into battle by adding very strict time frames for reporting to Congress ‘after’ sending troops into battle.

BLOG POST - Executive Orders
Executive Orders are supposed to be for ‘times of emergency’ not the whim of the president. This has become so limitless that it virtually relegates Congress to a meaningless status and elevates the president to an imperial level. Executive Orders have been abused by almost every president in the past and evolved to the place that Mr. Obama’s statement, “I have a pen and a phone” are a revelation of the Imperial Tyrannical Power of the President. Congress could and should take steps to bring this in check but they are not likely to do so. The Democrats enjoy the current power of this action and Republicans envision a time when they will regain power and want it protected for their use. Both, in that sense, are disregarding the Constitution and the responsibilities and duties of Congress to serve as a ‘check and balance’ to the other two branches of government.

It is appalling to watch the Constitution so thoroughly shredded by action or inaction in Washington. I do not wonder what our Founding Fathers would think I believe the existence of the Constitution and Bill of Rights as well as the volumes of quotes and expressions from them tell us they would consider our current state akin to the situation which brought about the initial America Revolution. They would DEMAND the president ‘cease and desist’ and that Congress immediately take the Constitutional steps to insure that this never happens again. Of course, our current legislators and president see it differently and only as WE THE PEOPLE get their attention is there hope!

May God bless you and may God bless America!