I’ve heard lame baseless arguments to support things but this ascends high on the list of the most ridiculous one could offer – “But it’s the law of the land….”   That is the argument of the left regarding the Affordable Health Care Act aka Obamacare.  They shout that as though it should mean that all opposition is immediately silenced and everyone simply complies!  Do you really want to go there?  Are you sure you want to make that argument?  Okay I gave you the opportunity to think so let’s follow that logic and argument through history.

             If we are to surmise that because a bill has been passed by Congress, signed into law by the President, and the Supreme Court has ruled on its Constitutionality we are to passively and obediently comply what do we do about some interesting events in history? 

             That logic would mean that people like Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King, Jr. and anyone involved in the Civil Rights Movement were ‘criminals’ because they did not comply with the ‘Separate But Equal’ – LAW OF THE LAND prior to the Brown v. Board of Education ruling in 1954 which overturned it.  That had been the LAW OF THE LAND for 58 years!  It was something that many felt could not and should not be allowed to stand, was discriminatory and should be opposed but if we follow the Democrat logic they were engaging in ‘unlawful’ or ‘criminal’ activity and instead of being applauded for their stance and fight they should be branded as criminals. That would mean that Bull Connor and those who took his stance should be lauded as patriots because they were upholding THE LAW OF THE LAND.  So again, I ask “Do you really want to take that path?”

            If you will examine history you will find that it was once the LAW OF THE LAND that women had ‘no vote’.  It was not until the Seneca Falls Convention in 1848 that the demand for the enfranchisement of women rose to the heights to propel it into reality.  In fact, after the Civil War, women led by Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and others over the disparity of enfranchising black men but still not giving women the right to vote.  It was not until the passage of the 19^th Amendment to the United States Constitution in 1920 that women gained the right to vote.  Does that mean that those women and men who demonstrated and roused public sentiment against THE LAW OF THE LAND should be regarded as ‘criminals’ because they did not obediently comply with a bad law?  Were they ‘hostage takers’, ‘terrorist’, and ‘evil’? 

           How about slavery, it was also THE LAW OF THE LAND.  In the Dred Scott decision in 1857 the Supreme Court ruled that African Americans, whether slave or free, could not be American citizens and therefore had no standing to sue or bring suit in a federal court, and that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the federal territories acquired after the creation of the United States.  Thus, the Supreme Court declared that slavery was THE LAW OF THE LAND and legal.  So, anyone on the side of the North in the Civil War was breaking the LAW OF THE LAND and those in the South were only enforcing the Law of the Land!   (I must insert that it is my view that the Civil War was about more than slavery and very high on the reason was States Rights.  My view, you do not have to agree.)  But, do we want to say that those who were opposed to slavery were breaking the law because, after all it was the LAW OF THE LAND, and those that supported it were simply enforcing the LAW OF THE LAND?   Do you really want to take that path?  Slavery was written by Democrats and approved by the Supreme Court.  So really!

            We could talk about “Prohibition” which led to more violence, corruption, and criminal activity than almost anything in our modern history.  It was a bad law and thousands if not millions of lives were ruined as a result of this law but it was THE LAW OF THE LAND.  The “Poll Tax” was the Law of the Land but was opposed.  Segregation was the Law of the Land but opposed.  So now when Obamacare is opposed by a majority of Americans and by members of Congress they are called ‘bigots’, ‘racist’, ‘terrorists,’ ‘extortionist’, and many other names because they are resisting THE LAW OF THE LAND.   We could have solved the healthcare problem or at least addressed it more reasonably without Obamacare but that would not give Barack Obama his ‘signature’ piece of legislation for his legacy.  What will that legacy be?  It depends on who is writing the history books.  Medicare/Medicaid could have been expanded, the payroll tax expanded and many other approaches but instead we have FORCED CONSCRIPTION into Health Insurance mandated by the government that is going to be of lesser quality and more expensive than what we had.  One of the reasons they are taking this pathway is because they do not want State Governments controlling any of the mix and want to move us to ‘Single Payer Government Run Healthcare’ and CONTROL.  

            So before you argue ‘It is the Law of the Land’ you might want to study history and realize that you are painting yourself in a corner.  But, since when did this president or the Democrat members of Congress become concerned with the Constitution or the Law?  They skirt it, bypass it, ignore it, and avoid it so frequently that one would wonder where they came up with that argument.  I guess it was from the same source that caused Hillary and Pelosi to utter, “What difference does it make?” on separate occasions and issues.

             America, bad laws are to be opposed and through peaceful and legal means changed, rescinded, and revoked.  Just because something is THE LAW OF THE LAND does not make it good or right.  

             God bless you and God bless America!

            On October 10, 2013 George Will’s column entitled “JFK and the Dawn of Punitive Liberalism” set me to thinking about what drives the liberal establishment and political elite in America.  Mr. Will’s article is interesting and thought provoking.  Is it correct?  I would say, largely yes!  He references a book written by James Piereson of the Manhattan Institute in 2007 entitled “Camelot and the Cultural Revolution:  How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism.”  Mr. Will states, “Hitherto a doctrine of American celebration and optimism, liberalism would now become a scowling indictment:  Kennedy was killed by America’s social climate, whose sickness required ‘punitive liberalism.”  That being a liberalism that would PUNISH America for her sins, injustices, and ills going all the way back to our founding.  It was a belief that would be advanced in a more pronounced way that ‘punitive liberalism’ would be required to purge this nation of those who were other than liberal.

             Punitive liberalism would transform or undergo a metamorphosis into the doctrine of grievance groups who believed they are owed redress for cumulative inherited injuries inflicted by the nation’s flawed history, poisonous present and ruinous future. It would become, in its view, the sole legitimate conscience of the nation because those on the right and less committed liberals had allowed the culture and society of this nation to descend into a state so toxic that it could murder a beloved president.  From that time forward to be a good liberal would require one to be one whose task and mission would be to scold and cajole anyone in opposition.  Those they deemed guilty would of necessity be punished and made to pay for their errors.

             With that analogy in mind when one views the likes of Barack Obama, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi it is easier to understand what is going on with them and why this president would want to MAKE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FEEL THE PAIN so he could blame the Republicans for our economic woes.  But, I am convinced that this is simply a tool that Obama and his handlers use allowing them to draw into their alliance those who follow liberalism and more directly punitive liberalism.  It allows them to deceive and dupe countless groups and cement them as solid voting blocks for the left and the Democrat party.  Those who believe they are ‘entitled’ to redress, reparation, and should be able to ‘punish’ all of a particular race or group who do not agree.  Forget the fact that the Democrat Party has long had a history of being other than supportive of ‘civil rights’ and interested in the ‘middle class’. 

            Yet, the core of liberalism certainly has been much more determined to revise history, force the nation to pay for the perceived sins they believe should be paid for, and propel them into a more solid position of power.  The core of ‘punitive liberalism’ seeks to ‘fundamentally transform America’ into something other than a Constitutional Republic and are willing to sacrifice virtually anyone or anything to achieve their objective.  I will acknowledge that from the time of the Kennedy assassination to the present liberalism has been much more aggressive in his pursuit and we have witnessed the transformation of the left politically into ‘style’ rather than ‘programmatic’.  Liberalism has consistently become more and more concerned with lifestyle rather than material well-being.

            However, it is my contention that the modern ‘punitive liberalism’ that we are witnessing goes much further back than the Kennedy assassination and has been in the works for over 100 years and finds its roots in Fabian Socialism to name one group that it has evolved from.  It is not truly interested in America because it views America as a flawed and evil nation.  It is not interested in individual liberties because it believes that an All Powerful Federal Government is the answer to the problems of the nation.  It is not interested in the Constitution because it considers the Constitution a hindrance rather than a guide or rule by which we operate.

             The Democrat Party, for the most part, certainly the National Party has so completely adopted the view of ‘punitive liberalism’ that it has become the enemy of a free nation.  I am not saying every person that calls or identifies themselves as a Democrat follows that philosophy, but many do.  Likewise I am not saying that anyone who calls themselves a Republican is good, moral, Constitutional, or desirous of an advancing Free Republic.  There are bad eggs in both parties.  The Republican establishment has become so like the Democrat establishment that it is in dire need of transformation.  In fact, what it needs in the absence of a formidable alternative is to be ‘reclaimed’ by the rank and file as it was under Ronald Reagan.  You can blast the ‘Tea Party’ and trash those like ‘Ted Cruz’ but if you truly follow what they promote you will find that their interest is America and returning to a Constitutional Republic.  You either support that or you do not, there really is not gray area in which to stand at this time. 

            I support a return to a Constitutional Republic that is governed and guided by the Constitution of these United States of America and will continue to recognize God’s hand in the formation and development of our nation.  I will give myself to the cause of any candidate that truly demonstrates that as a foundational principle in their political philosophy and belief.  We do not have to agree 100% of the time but we most assuredly must agree on the core critical points of that pursuit.

             May God bless you and may God bless America again!

            Of the many synonyms for ‘petulant’ we find peevish, bad-tempered, querulous, pettish, fretful, cross, irritable, sulky, snappish, crotchety, touchy, tetchy, testy, fractious, grumpy, disgruntled, crabby, insolent, impatient, pouting, bratty, ungracious, fault-finding.  One sentence example was – “He is easily irritated or annoyed; an incorrigibly fractious person; not the least nettlesome of his countrymen.”  All those synonyms and the sentence fit this President to the ‘T’.  He is one of, if not the most petty I have ever observed. 

            He resorts to ‘name calling’, throwing ‘temper tantrums’, huffing out of the room and bullying to get his way.  He reminds me of a ‘spoiled child’ much in need of the board of education applied behind the barn in the aft portion of the body.  It would seem that his life has been one of being catered to and having such an ‘entitlement mentality’ that he truly believes that his is a ‘rock star’ or some ‘god’ and everyone should be in awe of him when he walks into the room.  To question him or disagree with him is beyond his ability to accept or deal with.  I can only imagine working for or with him because one would have to walk on egg shells all the time for fear that he would blow a gasket over the smallest of things. 

             He has, from all appearance, an incredible lack of ability to be forthcoming and honest.  It seems that, to him, the truth is whatever he desires it to be without concern for the facts.  Even when he publicly makes a statement or promise and it comes to light that it is erroneous he then declares that he did not say that as with his Syrian Red Line he claimed the world drew the line not Barack Obama.  He often appears incapable of comprehending that as a human being (I am loosely attributing that status to him) he is capable of being wrong as most of us learned early on in life.  However, no one in his entourage, cabinet, party, or even most Republicans has the courage to ‘call it like it is’. 

            Sadly, the Republicans in Congress of the McCain, Boehner, Peter King, Lisa Murkowski, Chuck Grassley ilk, and others all want to ‘kiss the king’s ring’ and bow at his alter rather than standing for the Constitution, and the principles this nation was founded on.  It is past time that we CLEAN HOUSE in the HOUSE and SENATE and send every RINO home that we can.  It is time that we identify them and call them out.  It is time that we diligently work to find people to ‘primary’ them with and seek to defeat them so we can have constitutional, conservative, America loving candidates in the general elections across this nation.  That means that each of us in our local precincts must work to support that type of candidate.  We need to become involved in the process on a county-wide and state-wide basis.  We need to volunteer, campaign for, and contribute as we can to the cause of Constitutional, Conservative, and America loving candidates.

             If we fail to stand up to the BULLIES in the White House, the Democrat, and Republican Parties we are sealing the doom of this Republic that we have loved and hold dear.  We will have failed to do what Benjamin Franklin said, “We have a Republic if we can keep it.”  It is ours.  The government is supposed to be ‘of the people, for the people, and by the people.’  It is not to be of the Aristocratic Political Elite in Washington or the State Houses, it is to be the Joe the Plumber, and Morris the Electricians of this nation.  It is to be the average citizen who works, pays taxes, and follows the rules.  I want my country back and am committed to doing all in my power to see that become a reality. 

             So as you focus on the upcoming elections I plead with you to invest your time, energy, and finances to RECLAIMING AMERICA the America the colonist fought for and the Framers provided for us.  If it is worth having it is worth fighting for!

            May God bless you and may God bless America again!

            On October 2, 2013 Representative Henry Waxman (D. California) was asked if he had read all 10,535 pages of the final regulations of Obamacare that have been published thus far by the Federal Resister he replied, “Is it important that I read it?”  Duh!  Congressman you are part of Legislature that passed the Affordable Health Care Act and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) as well as the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (HCERA).  We have had 110 final regulations published, to date, by the Federal Register on how Obamacare will be implemented, so – YES IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU READ IT!   This thing is so massive that NO ONE truly knows what is in it and as one writer pointed out it is eight times the number of pages than there are in the Gutenberg Bible which has 642 two-sided pages or 1,286 pages. 

            Harry Reid stated that Democrats won’t ‘pick and choose’ what parts of the government to fund while speaking at a press conference on October 2^nd.  CNN reporter Dana Bash asked about helping out a hypothetical ‘one child with cancer’ and Reid responded, “Why would we do that?”  How is that for the loving, compassionate, caring Democrats? 

            The President on the other hand demonstrated his incredible concern for the situation in Washington by showing off his skills – on the golf course!  He reportedly set a new personal best during the round.  Now that is incredibly important!  We certainly need the President to improve his golf game while the country goes to hell in a hand basket, so to speak.  In fact that round was the 35^th round of the year meaning he has played more golf this year than any previous year with 19 last year (a down year), 34 in 2011, and 30 in 2010.  I wish I could have played half that many personally but I was too busy trying to insure that my family was taken care of, but then I’m not a King so we lowly must work while the aristocrats play.

            Prior to 1995 in the face of a government ‘shut down’ the terms used for people or services that would be affected was ‘essential’ or ‘non-essential’.  That was tweaked because it was not deemed politically correct terminology so now we are calling it ‘excepted’ and ‘non-excepted.’  However, many are still using the old terms but only when they are trying to reflect badly on the Republicans.

             The military continues to operate, the embassies stay open around the world, the mail continues to run, air traffic controllers stay on the job, all emergency medical services, border patrol, federal prisons, most law enforcement, emergency disaster assistance, overseeing the banking system, operating the power grid, and guarding federal property continues without interruption.  That is unless Mr. Obama decides to violate the law and the Constitution and do something differently and as he has said repeatedly, “I’m in charge I’ll do what I want.”  I was unaware that the election of 2008 or 2012 was to install a Dictator or Emperor in the United States but I guess I missed that memo.

            Since over 70% of Americans are opposed to the Affordable Health Care Act aka Obamacare it would seem logical that the latest compromise that the Repuplicrats offered to DELAY Obamacare would be acceptable since Mr. Obama has already arbitrarily delayed the Employer Mandate without Constitutional authority, I might add.  It would seem that the delay of the Individual Mandate would be no big deal but since the objective is to MAKE AMERICA HURT in order to punish the Republicans in an effort to regain control of the House in 2014 we have the adamant unflinching authoritarian demand that NO NEGOTIATIONS WITH REPUBLICANS….   Thus we have the shutdown!  Who will blink first?  Probably the Republicans for they fully believe that their position is so tedious and they are filled with such trepidation that will, as in the past cave. Of course Mr. Obama, in the media, is declaring that he has ‘bent over backward’ to work with the Republicans and would gladly negotiate with them on Obamacare IF they give him ‘everything he wants’ on the budget and spending.  Pardon me, but if I give the person I’m trying to negotiate with EVERYTHING THEY WANT what do I have left to negotiate with?  But, I keep forgetting that Mr. Obama and the Democrats consider is ‘ignorant’ beyond measure and the voters keep proving them right! 

             What will that mean in 2014?  It will probably mean that the Democrats gain seats and the Republicans become the villains they are being painted in the minds of millions of voters.  The scare tactics used by the Democrats and the failure to articulate, package, and sell their platform by the Republicans will likely mean disastrous results in 2014 and possibly 2016.  We so need a Ronald Reagan who is both conservative and articulate to rise up in the name of Constitutionality and Conservatism.  America needs a Moses to lead us out of this wilderness of debt, deficit, and tyranny.

             I plead with one and all to become involved like never before, stay informed, and if you pray please become an intercessor for this nation.  Our present and our future as a Free People depend on what we do in the next few years!

             God bless you and God bless America again!

            In my latest reading of the Constitution of these United States of America I was unable to find one mention of “Election or Coronation of Kings” as being the course of action by the American people.  I did find the “Election of a President” but not a “Sovereign, Monarch, Aristocracy, or King”.  So I am a bit perplexed seeing how this current president lives and acts along with the ‘first lady’ and the ‘first family’.  I realize that some people are so ‘privileged’ that they believe they are ‘entitled’ to treatment as a ‘god, sovereign, royalty or a monarch’ but that is not the authorization of the American Constitution.  I find the lack of angst by the media, Congress, or even much of the American public to be inexcusable.  We are in such severe economic times, citizens are losing their homes, jobs, life savings, and living in poverty at such a severe level that one would think that ‘excessive lavish extravagance’ by this President and family would elicit the ire of most including the media, Congress, and public but it doesn’t. 

             I do not know if the aforementioned are ‘afraid’ to challenge this President fearing being called a ‘racist’ or something equally as bad or worse, or if they believe he should live and act as a regal?  Either way it is an incredible indictment on the current American mentality. It has been my observation that when someone is afforded power and has access to lavish funds frequently will abuse both the power and the funds UNTIL and UNLESS they are stopped.  When there is no opposition or only token opposition to his lifestyle and insatiable appetite for spending why would he not continue to act as a Regal Monarch?

            One of the latest incidents reflecting the mindset of someone who either has a ‘god-complex’ believes that they are ‘entitled’, or believes that they have been ‘crowned as a Regals’ was the ridiculous expense of the ‘first dog’ being transported on a separate flight. WHY?  Well the immediate cry of many was that in the Muslim faith dogs are considered ‘unclean’ and travel would of necessity be separate.  Is that the case?  Possibly or is it just that the mindset and attitude of entitlement drives this President and family to do things that will show the world that they CAN and DO live lavishly while the populace, by and large, live in dire economic conditions.  That has been the way of Kings, Tyrants, and Despots throughout history.  They live lavish lives while their subjects live in squalor and struggle to survive.  Nothing is too good or to be withheld from the Regal and that is clearly the Obama mindset. 

             Why does this bother me so much?  Because when you examine the record of the number and lavishness of the vacations that they have taken, the separate vacations that Michelle and the children have taken, the incredible expense of security that he demands, the overboard entourage that accompanies them everywhere you find that it is astronomical in the actual cost to the tax-payer.  The tax-payer who is working to keep his/her head above water.  The tax-payer that is being lampooned as ‘not paying his/her fair share’ by this ‘would be emperor’.  The tax-payer who is seeing his/her America Dream completely vanish.  The tax-payer who is forced to ‘cut back’ and live a more austere lifestyle while watching the ‘first family’ parade around the country and the world in luxury.  This Presidents claims to be the ‘defender of the middle-class’ but who of the middle-class can live that lifestyle.  It is the lifestyle not just of the ‘rich and famous’ but the ‘Regals and Monarchs”. 

            While I do not mind and desire that the American Presidents are protected, travel in a style commensurate with the top leaders of the world, I do find it insulting and objectionable that, in times of economic hardship, there is such disregard and empathy for the American people.  I find it insulting that he would make campaign speeches lambasting the ‘rich’ when he is doing far worse than the most lavish of the rich in that they pay their own way and he does not – WE PAY!  I find it insulting that he would attempt to operate politically, socially, or privately as a KING.  The Constitution affords no such luxury.  He is an ‘elected’ public servant or supposed to be.  He has not ascended to the Throne of America he was inaugurated into the Office of President not crowned King.  Congress should cease treating him as royalty, take the gloves off, defend the Constitution, and the interests of the American people IMMEIDATELY!  It should not matter what party you are in or identify with his actions, lavish living, and incredible spending should infuriate you.

             Where are the lovers of Freedom, the defenders of the Constitution, and the Patriots?  Where are those who are struggling to make ends meet?  Where are those who want a Restored Constitutional Democratic Republic?  Where are the representatives of the people?  WHERE?  Sadly, it seems that those of us willing to be vocal are in the minority but we dare not allow ourselves to become complacent.  We must attempt to turn up the heat, intensify the cry for liberty, and become involved both in prayer and work like never before.  AMERICA IS AT RISK!

             May God bless you and may God bless the United States of America!

            For several years now I have wondered how it is that if a Conservative, Constitutionalist, or Republican makes a faux pas in speaking or saying something that is factually, historically, geographically, incorrect he never hears the end of it and is branded as ‘dumb’ or some other equally demeaning characterization, but if Mr. Obama does it is because he is so ‘brilliant’ that his mind cannot entertain things so mundane and unimportant as how many states there are in the Union. 

             Recently, and most of you have already moved on from this, Mr. Obama was on Jay Leno’s show campaigning and trying to be likeable by the public and made so many gaffes that had that been George W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, or any other Republican President or politician we would still be hearing it in the main stream or lame stream media.  It would be in every newspaper, on every national television and radio network, and the laughing or the ridicule would be endless, but not so with Mr. Obama.  There is deafening silence from those venues.  It is the ‘standard of no standard’ when it comes to him and his administration.  It is hypocrisy and so blatantly partisan that one would have to wonder how any rational voter could possibly not see through it and become disgusted with the double-standard.  But, I forget that many are ‘willingly blind’ and therefore the ‘standard of no standard’ is not only acceptable but desirable.

             Candidate Obama spoke in a church in Selma, Alabama on the anniversary of the ‘Bloody Sunday March’ where he told his audience that the Kennedy’s did an airlift that would bring young Africans to America so they could be educated and his grandfather heard that call and sent his father, Barack Obama, Sr. to America.  That would be great but there is a small or not so small problem.  In following the timeline of Barack’s life we find that he was born in August 1961 so he would have been conceived in November 1960 (or there about).  He suggested that it was through those endeavors that his mother and father got together and produced him.  That is a bit problematic and would suggest that the shout his grandfather heard would have had to have been that of Dwight David Eisenhower not Jack or Bobby Kennedy.  Jack Kennedy did not assume office until January 1961 so it would have been impossible for him to have been instrumental in a program that brought Barack, Sr. to Hawaii in 1959.  He declared that what happened in 1965 in Selma gave his mother a white woman from Kansas and his father a black man from Kenya the courage to get married and have a child.  The wee problem here is that since he was born on August 4, 1961 and the first of the three marches did not occur until March 7, 1965 or at least five years after Barack’s parents met.  But who is checking facts it is only a political speech right?

            Of course when candidate Obama declared that he had campaigned in all 57 States the correlation with the 57 Islamic states was immediately dismissed and labeled as Islamophobic and racist so most Republicans backed completely away from it.  When he declared in September 2011 in Cincinnati that America is the country that built the ‘Intercontinental Railroad’ no one batted an eye.  When did we and where is that railroad that spans continents?  Oh I guess it is in one of the 57 States that I haven’t visited yet.  Also in November 2011 he said while speaking in Hawaii, “When I meet with world leaders, what’s striking – – whether it’s in Europe or here in Asia….”   When did Hawaii become a part of Asia?  Oh I guess my geography needs to be refreshed with the revisionist geography of Mr. Obama and the left.  Then the classic, “UPS and FedEx are doing just fine, right?  It’s the Post Office that’s always having problems.”  That was his argument for Obamacare.  WHAT?  Mr. Obama you just destroyed your argument and identified why we should have ‘less’ not ‘more’ government involvement.

            Then the Leno show where there were a number of gaffes but nothing sticks to him and he is held to ‘no standard’ again.  Remember when Dan Quayle misspelled ‘potato’ and how long that continued and to this day he is labeled and characterized as being lacking in the mental department.  Mr. Obama downplayed the threat of terrorism and we all know that Al Qaeda is not on the run, decimated, nor has their core been depleted.  They are possibly better organized today and as committed to terrorism as ever.  He wrongly claimed that Vladimir Putin once ran the KGB but the fact is Mr. Putin was a Lt. Colonel in the KGB not the head.  His geography is abysmal and we now have the “Gulf Coast’ and the “Gulf of Mexico” being somewhere near Savannah, Charleston, and Jacksonville.  He mixed up the summer and winter Olympics in his statements but no problem his intelligence is so astounding that small details like that should be expected from the “Big Brained People” such as Mr. Obama.

            He said one more thing that bothered me and I would have hoped for more inquiry to find out what he meant.  He said with regard to the question about Benghazi, “The odds of people dying in a terrorist attack obviously are still a lot lower than in a car accident, unfortunately.”  So it would be better if the odds of dying in a terrorist attack were higher than dying in a car accident?  You mean you want and lament that there are not more and more effective terror attacks?  PLEASE EXPLAIN MR. OBAMA!  I am waiting for your explanation but I know that it won’t be forthcoming.  If that was a Freudian slip it would suggest that as he declared in his book, “If the political winds ever turn sour I will side with the Muslims” is much more problematic than anyone thought or has suggested.

            I, for one, am tired of the standard of no standard with regard to this president or any politician.  I’m longing for and will work for a restored America, that honors and obeys the Constitution, and for a media that is, at least, a little honest who reports the news not one that slants and shapes it for their political agenda.

            God bless America and God bless you!